Way to go Dwyane Wade. Credit to him for dominating in the Finals with a better team than LeBron has ever had and in one of the NBA's weaker seasons. After that postseason it was toss-up for me, but it's a no brainer now that LeBron has rounded out his game and substantially improved every season. Anyways, it's not a wash on offense or defense. Strictly comparing their abilities, give Wade the edge in ball-handling, footwork, and his jumper in the intermediate area. Give LeBron the edge in the broader areas like driving, playmaking, finishing, three-point shooting, foul-drawing, overall scoring ability, and everything else that doesn't come to mind right now. And, LeBron is much, much more physically imposing, which certainly counts for a lot. Defensively, it's much easier to make a case for LeBron. Physically, he's longer, stronger, more explosive, and as a result, more versatile: he can defend the post more effectively, guard four positions, play more harassing help defense, and control the defensive glass. As opposed to Wade, who is vulnerable in the pivot against bigger guards and is limited to only defending the backcourt. They're similar in that they're both very disruptive help defenders, and they're different in that LeBron is smarter — as in, he doesn't have to resort to gambling and risk-taking techniques as much as Wade to play more effective defense and make better decisions. So, in summation, LeBron is more dominant, more impactful, and consequently, more better. (This post could've been dissected deeper, but for the sake of length, I simplified and grouped most of it together.) Whether Wade is more complete is debatable, but LeBron is a more dominant offensive player. On defense, Wade is undeniably the better gambler, with just outstanding anticipation and range. Probably the best wing at recovery defense. But that's the extent of his defensive advantage over LeBron.