Hmm...I am trying to think of a way to put this that won't sound completely rude, but I am coming up empty so I will just be flat out honest. You are clueless. I will start by saying that I think a good manager in the American League can be a good manager in the National League. If a guy has been around baseball long enough they can pick up on it. But you sound like a complete dunce by saying there is no difference in strategy. Have you ever watched a National League game before? I am doubting that. I will offer a few examples. In the American League, if you want to make a pitching change, there are only three issues that need to be considered. 1. Is the current pitcher gassed/getting rocked? 2. Is there a relief pitcher warmed up in the bullpen? 3. Is it late in the game and do you want to hand the game over to a closer/setup guy/specialist of some sort? If the answer to any of these questions is "yes", the manager can trot out to the mound and make the change. In the National League, you must consider the implications it has on your lineup. Say it is the 5th inning and your starting pitcher is on the mound but in a lot of trouble. There is 1 out, but the guy is getting shelled. The pitchers spot is due up 2nd in the next half inning. The manager must weigh in his head "do I go get this guy now and waste a relief pitcher for just 2 outs?", or "do I go get this guy now and let the incoming relief pitcher bat in the next inning to save the bench?", or "do I make a double switch here and take out one of my starters this early in the game", or simply "do I let the current pitcher finish the inning, even if it means a couple additional runs being scored?". Another example of strategy prevalent only in NL baseball. Say you are the home team. It is the bottom of the fifth inning, bases loaded, 2 outs, pitchers spot coming up. Your starting pitcher has been very good thus far and could easily throw another inning or two, but you are facing the other team's ace and who knows if another opportunity like this will come up. Do you let the pitcher bat and get the additional innings out of him, all while letting a golden opportunity for some runs go to waste? Or do you go to your bench, and leave the game in the hands of the bullpen at this relatively early stage of the game? In the American League, if you have this situation, you can go to the bench without it having any implications on the pitching staff. Or better yet, you could be lucky enough to have a lineup like the Red Sox, Yankees, or Angels, where any batter in the lineup could hit 1-5 in almost any NL lineup, and thus such a situation will never arise. Another example. Say your team is in the field, and there are 2 runners on base and 2 outs with the other team's 8-hole batter up. Do you intentionally walk the 8-hole hitter and more than likely get out of the inning? Do you pitch around him and hope he gets himself out, with the worst-case-scenario of him walking and then facing the pitcher? Or do you go after him and try to get him out so the pitchers spot leads off the next inning? These are all the basic things that National League managers need to ponder during the course of a game that American League managers do not even need to think about. And this only scratches the surface. So, do you still stand by your statement that the strategy is the same for both leagues? Actually, don't even answer that, I know you will say yes and spew some bull[expletive] all while refusing to admit that you were wrong.