Leaderboard

Based on the letter of the law, from that angle that's a charge. Whether or not refs are usually too in awe of Kobe to call it on him is a different story, but that's a charge.

Offensive talent throughout the roster? Speedy guards who can push the tempo? Talented isolation scorers? Quick handed defenders who can generate steals? The Golden State Warriors have the players tailored to executing Don Nelson’s run amok gameplan. Therefore, after Golden State’s 118-109 home loss to the Washington Wizards, the problem isn’t with the players, it’s with the philosophy. Less than five percent of Golden State’s shot attempts were taken after four or more passes were made in the half court. Instead the Warriors were contrite to have the player bringing the ball up sprint into the frontcourt and jack up a shot, or make one pass to a player who then put up a shot attempt. Specifically, the Warriors shot 10-22 for 20 points when the player who first caught or dribbled the ball in the frontcourt didn't make a pass. They shot 13-29 for 28 points when the player made one pass. That's 51 out of 83 shot attempts taken where no more than one pass was made on a possession, and that doesn't even take into account offensive putbacks (where the Warriors were 4-7 for 8 points). Those 51 shot attempts led to 48 points for a ratio worse than one-to-one. Ususually an NBA team should average around 1.1 points per shot attempt, so Golden State's early offense philosophy was statistically ineffective, especially compared to how they did after making just one or two more passes. When making two passes, the team's shot 9-16 for 21 points, an excellent ratio. On three passes, the team went 3-7 for 8 points. Golden State did misfire on a four-pass possession and a five-pass possession, but the numbers show that Golden State was more effective when they moved the ball. Defensively, the Warriors flashed quick hands attacking loose dribbles, swarmed to double team any poor ball handler, and gambled brazenly into passing lanes. However, while the gameplan did seduce the Wizards into abandoning their own discipline for stretches, and while the Warriors did create open looks in transition and early offense, they were no match for Gilbert Arenas’ own dazzling offensive display. Plus, whenever the Wizards attacked the Warriors in the paint, generating layups was a piece of cake. Golden State’s interior and baseline rotations were completely ineffective. Sometimes, this was the case of Anthony Randolph not being aware of what was happening on the court, but mostly it was because the Warriors often entrusted pipsqueak Monta Ellis, Stephen Curry, or C.J. Watson to be the player sliding along the baseline to meet penetrators. Twice Anthony Randolph was so intent on stripping Brendan Haywood that Haywood put the ball on the floor from 18 feet out on the way to a dunk. The Warriors decided to defend the struggling Caron Butler with either Ellis, Watson, or Anthony Morrow. Butler just took his time in the post and either shot over or went through the overmatched Warriors on his way to a 13-22 shooting performance and 28 points. Golden State also switched every screen not set by Brendan Haywood. As a result, guards were often stuck defending Butler and Jamison in the post. Golden State was habitually late in their transition defense. The Warriors were also punished on their defensive backboard. While they only gave up 10 offensive rebounds, they knocked a number of missed shots out of bounds while getting shoved around under their basket. The Warriors pathetic lack of size is best illustrated by the points in the paint they afforded the Wizards: 58. Plus another 21 from the free throw stripe. And while Ellis scored 30 points with seven assists, he was destroyed by his counterpart Gilbert Arenas for 45 points and 13 dimes, the majority in head-to-head confrontations. If Golden State’s defense was even competent, they might have had a chance to win the game. While Arenas, Haywood, and Butler decimated them inside, the softer, more impatient, and less talented Wizards were flustered by Golden State’s extreme pace. Deshawn Stevenson shot 0-3, Nick Young 1-4 with two turnovers, Andray Blatche 4-12 with three turnovers, Antawn Jamison 4-14 with two turnovers, and Dominic McGuire didn’t attempt a shot while committing a turnover. Plus, the Warriors pilfered 11 steals which they converted into 39 fast break points. Anthony Randolph showed the electrifying talent which excites every Warriors fan in existence, with the maddeningly low basketball IQ which has him in Nelson’s permanent doghouse. While Randolph can run and jump with any forward, and has guard-like handling and passing skills, he often passes into double teams or at the pass-target’s feet. Since Randolph’s rail thin, Brendan Haywood stole his lunch money in the post, and on an inbounds play, he dribbled the ball inbounds before making the pass, on a turnover Jeff Van Gundy incredulously labeled as “stupidity.” Stephen Curry is an excellent shooter when unpreserved defensively, has good passing skills, above-average lateral quickness, and has a nice touch around the basket. He’s also physically puny and soft. Corey Maggette is the only muscle man on the Warriors, and he put his guns to good use against the Wizards, barreling his way to the hoop on his way to 12 free throws (making 11) and a 6-10 day from the field. Anthony Morrow is a shooter who shot too many blanks (2-8) and who played no defense. Chris Hunter played effective interior defense, but he was abused when defending in early offense, and laid bricks when shooting his mid-range jumper (0-3). C.J. Watson is small and quick, but he too is defenseless. Vladimir Radmanovic looked to make the extra pass, finished on the break, but was absent in his rotations. Sadly, the way the Warriors are set up, the only way they can play is by forcing opponents to try to play a 200 mile-per-hour basketball game. Supposedly, against soft, undisciplined, opponents, the Warriors can force other teams to play at a pace they aren’t accustomed to and run them out of the building. But if the Warriors can beat a Wizards team that isn’t high on discipline, nor are incredibly talented, who can they beat? At least when the Warriors had Stephen Jackson, Baron Davis, and Jason Richardson, the Warriors had three players who were incredibly strong for their position. Each of those players on select occasions also could play effective defense. That’s why the Warriors team from two seasons ago was almost affectionately known as a circus. All that remains from those circus teams are the clowns, Don Nelson and Chris Cohan whose power trips and incompetence make them the laughingstock of the league.

This is getting embarrassing. ... No it's not. It's saying the player can move as much as he pleases to maintain legal position. Read again: Legal guarding position was already established, hence he was able to legally move to draw a charge. http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/2605/frame1c.jpg Feet are both down. There's your logic. Please stop. Bogut didn't move to get in front of Bryant, he was already there. Are you purposely being dense here? Just imagining what you want to see? Look again, closely. Closely. http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/2605/frame1c.jpg Kobe hasn't even gathered his shot yet. It's a charge. You're wrong. Cute post to save face. I showed you the official rulebook, I cited the exact sections that clearly stated the rule, and I posted close-up pictures to further prove my point. You tried (and failed) to manipulate the text to favor your argument, and you also referenced personal experiences to disprove official rules. You can continue to patronize and take your shots at me but it doesn't hide the fact that you're wrong. You're wrong. I found this quote particularly amusing. I rebutted every one of your points, and you hopped along the debate only replying selectively to convenient portions of every post. It's like that in every debate with you. I'll tell you this now: I'm wrong about a lot of things, but the difference is that I can admit it in the end. And I think it's only right that I believe I'm right when I'm arguing, otherwise... wtf is the point? Also, you're wrong.

It has always been called that way. Always. Look at the Battier clip where there's at least three instances of him moving his feet, but still drawing a charge. Unless we're factoring the fact that he's Kobe Bryant. If so, then there was no travel, and it's an obvious foul on Bogut.

That's not what I'm arguing. The article states that it almost seems like he makes every potential game winning shot, when the reality is he only makes about 25% of them. People glorify the ones he makes, and eventually forget the ones he's missed.

...and I could play WR for the Bills.

^Hi Chris.

Don't be happy till he does it on an NBA team.

dirk got hurt, i hope hes ok

LMAO! The sad thing is he probably could.

Well, I for one

Paul Pierce doesn't care about white people.

Hell, I'd be saying this too if I couldn't dunk anymore.

I love me some good fish, cook some on a wooden plank marinate it with some sauces= delish

I wasnt all that impressed by his 55 against the Warriors. They were not even playing defense, a chair could score 55 on them. Hes obviously a good player and a good scorer but the Bucks took his high scoring games and thought lets give this guy the keys to our offense and let him take as many shots from here on out, and it obviously hasnt worked. Sooner or later they will make him play a reduced role.