Leaderboard

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMH6d0-5fqU&feature=player_embedded

LOL, injured. This is playing injured... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zgdb9V6i5Ws Playing with an injured wrist is a hell of a lot harder than an elbow.

The video is full of truth, lmao, a cocky Miami no nothing Miami fan would dismiss it as "butthurt" I guess ROFL No if Bron picked NY I'd still think he's a douche, I obviously would not hate on him, but I would not defend him destroying the city of Cleveland on live TV. I don't ride Romo Romo isn't even one of my top 3 favorite Cowboys, I just make accurate observations regarding his ability to play the quarterback position. I didn't even hate on LeBron in this thread lol so don't know why YOU are so butthurt over people hating on LeBron LMAO!

I think the arguement that his team is too talented has a lot of holes in it. Of course if Durant puts up 30PPG and his team gets a 1-4 seed in the West that it'll be his to lose, or if Paul leads the Hornets to 50+ games he'll be more deserving, but right now Rondo is playing out of his mind. Yes, he has one of the most talented and deep teams in the league, but he's the motor that makes it all work. Without Rondo, they are old, slow and have a bunch of former stars that can't carry a team anymore. He gives the team a spark that no one else on the team is capable of providing. At this point, even though a healthy (key word) KG is still a better player, Rondo is without a doubt the team's MVP. With that said, the issue Rondo has in the MVP race is that he's not a top 10 player in the league, which IMO means he should not be league MVP. He's not even the best player at his position, which is another dagger to his chances. I still think he should be in consideration, but IMO the race will come down to Kobe, Paul, Durant and Howard (LeBron/Wade will cancel each other out). If Paul can get the Hornets to 50+ wins, I think he should be the favorite to win MVP.

We had no reason to go into either country because our intentions were not what we said they were. We're fighting people that aren't even in al-qaeda, making more enemies. Does our military believe that al-qaeda will suddenly walk into our war zone and fight us? I'm pretty sure I told you what we should've done. Guess who looks like the most intelligent person coming out of all this? Bin Laden. Instead of fighting a war, he attacked and watched us get stupid. His biggest terrorist act isn't the 9/11 incident...it's actually watching a country go into major debt by blowing trillions of money on a war that serves no purpose, making more enemies, and having their own being killed off of US soil.

We didn't win anything...what are you talking about? The war was even titled "The war against terrorism." Tell me...how are you going to end terrorism? You don't go to war against an act that anyone can create, unless you decide you're going to kill everyone on the planet. We should be defending our soil, sure, but only by monitoring what goes on here. We never, ever needed to go overseas to find a terrorist group that is spread out among countries, diving into the center of the Middle East and through their religious mini-wars, and pretending like we were there for a purpose. Cool, we somehow accomplish our task and bring down what we feel is the core of al-qaeda. Six months later, a guy from Syria, who has been living in the states since 2002, hijacks a plane and flies it into another building. If we're led by Republicans, that means we go over to Syria and destroy their country, put their people in danger, probably fly over the country and drop bombs (like we did in Baghdad), and put our country in even more danger than it's already in because we think we know what we're doing. There's no way anyone can convince me you can have a war against a single act, because a) the act happens, and it's over with, and b) you can't defeat something that can be attempted by anyone in and outside of the states. We marched our troops over to find and execute Saddam, take over land so we can have cheaper oil, and then search mountains in countries that would rather fight us than let us stroll in and take over their land. For such a powerful and rich country, we sure got exposed, and nine years later (yeah, nine years), we have accomplished nothing.

GO WARRIORS!

No Poe comment on how immature this is and we are? He's slacking..

Seriously? This dudes bustin off the greatest dougie ever and you guys are worried about how long its taking?

Who's down to try it with me?

Gimme Shelter

Anyway realize that the name of that gun Kobe was holding said Mamba?

Should put them over the top I think. Try trading for Jeff Foster. wow lmao

I love how the Democratic party is now being blamed for the issues in this country. After Bush in the republicans ran this country into the ground for 8 years you expect Obama to be able to come in and change it all in just 2 years? It's not even like he will continue to have the opportunity because the Republicans in the HoR are just gonna [expletive] block all the policies. Republicans need to admit their failure and have the self dignity to let someone else clean their mess for a change. Of course the democrats aren't perfect, but obv the Republican party ain't better. Gotta give a president more than 2 lousy years to actually change a country.

The only thing that will be waiting for Rose in the paint is DA MOZGOV http://blogs.hoopshype.com/blogs/sierra/files/2010/09/mozgov_russia.jpg DA TURIAF http://partmule.com/blog16/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/turiaf.jpg

This is the problem with politics. You think that, because I support Obama, I support every single thing a Democrat lays on the table. Most every single time I hear this kind of stuff, it comes from a damn Republican, which is funny. Select a President, throw the best in office without labels, and start thinking of ways to help our country without promoting a group of ideas. The House and the Senate are full of puppets, for the most part, and it's sad. I wouldn't be opposed to this country locking all borders and forcing everyone to become citizens before stepping foot in the US (and, of course, finding a way to speed up that process). Wanting to close borders or crack down on illegal immigration doesn't mean I'm Republican, it means I don't need strangers, family or friends telling me what to believe in. What wealth? And a genocide is different than a war for oil and a war against an act. As stated earlier, if we're going to go in to fight terrorism, we might as well plan on a war against murder, and maybe even racism...see how effective that will be.

Zo, without a doubt. There is honestly only one thing that Dwight has over Zo : he's more athletic than him. And that's it. Other than that Zo was better than him everywhere else. First on offense. Well it's true that Dwight has improved since he entered the league but, even if he's working with Hakeem, I think that he ain't gonna get better than that now. Howard is just not a great offensive player, he's become an alright one though but I don't believe he will ever be better than that. So he definitely can't compare with someone like Zo who had a lot of post moves and a great offensive repertoire. On defense Zo was also better. Alright I know that Dwight was DPOY twice, but I always had a problem with that personally as he's clearly not a great man to man defender... He's a great help defender, certainly the best (a case can be made for Josh Smith though), but not a man to man defender. I had a discussion about it with another poster recently and he kinda made me change my mind about it though, he made a good point by saying that despite the fact that Howard wasn't a good man to man defender, his presence only was enough to have a huge impact on his team, defensively. Which is true. So I can accept that Howard was named DPOY now, even though I would have personally voted for Sefolosha last year... But anyhow that's another story, back to Zo he was definitely a way better man to man defender, no doubt. So there is no doubt for me that Zo was definitely a better player than Dwight. In fact, Dwight and Yao are two very good players, and I like 'em both, but honestly none of them can't compare to the five best center of the 90's, the last true great centers, that were Ewing, Shaq, Robinson, Hakeem and Zo. No doubt about that.

http://i53.tinypic.com/zmmuy8.jpg ... http://i53.tinypic.com/zmmuy8.jpg

Heres what he got on the other forearm..... http://www.villaspain.co.uk/images/wheelchair%20icon.jpg