Leaderboard

Sacresanity too.

http://i.imgur.com/nAugo.jpg

According to opponent FG%, NBA history: 1) 1999 Spurs - 40.2% 2) 1999 Knicks - 40.3% 3) 2004 Spurs - 40.9% 4) 1998 Spurs - 41.1% 5) 1999 Heat - 41.1% 6) 2004 Rockets - 41.2% 7) 2004 Pistons - 41.3% 8) 1999 Jazz - 41.3% 9) 1999 Hawks - 41.3% 10) 2013 Pacers - 41.4% 11) 2004 Wolves - 41.4% 12) 2000 Lakers - 41.6% 13) 2001 Knicks - 41.7% 14) 1999 Blazers - 41.7% 15) 2008 Celtics - 41.9% And if you consider 1999 as a bad season to analyze offense or defense from (because it was the lockout season, and teams didn't have a true offseason or camps to practice), Pacers are top five.

Why would I care? I know you don't like the Lakers. If you want to root for a particular team, that's fine. Pretty sure you would've busted his ass, and shoved it in his face, if the Knicks had actually won tonight. I've been here longer than anyone, so I know everyone's tendencies. Post count is part of how we judge the site's overall success. We don't have any new members because nobody wants to come to a dead site. Is this correct? It is. Most who I've talked to don't even know who Shaliq is. Instead, they want to stick around and post at another site, usually one that is much more active. So post count doesn't matter? I beg to differ. I've ran the site for eight years, and I've seen 400+ activity logs. If anyone knows what's great, and what's wrong, it's me. Nobody is qualified to answer the question, aside from me...let's be real. I'm simply asking for your opinion. The FACT is, the issue with OTR lies in this community not being willing to welcome in new members (this used to be a problem with new Lakers fans, still may be), and because this place has "cliques" that basically only want to talk sports with each other...it isolates others looking in, and nobody new wants that. There are a LOT of members here who need to work on their conduct. For almost all of you, I'm just throwing my hands up and looking away, because the majority of those who like to stir up trouble every week are never going to change, and quite frankly, banning 2-3 members would be like shutting down the NFL forum these days. If things are much better when he's gone, why wasn't it proven? There was absolutely NOTHING changed, at all...well, aside from less posts, me having to go post CBS articles in almost every game topic before I move them (and I still do), me never having to approve new registered members (who you guys assume are him, but aren't....and I'm pretty sure I'd know), etc. It's all talk. That's it. He posts a picture of something in off-topic, and it gets made fun of...when it doesn't offend a SINGLE PERSON on this site. He posts a drawing, and a 2-3 page conversation is created over something that doesn't matter...at all...to anyone here aside from him. When we had that female Orlando Magic fan posting here, posting in every Gameday topic who she was rooting for (in team colors), were you guys calling her a troll? Nope. You just thought she was acting like a bandwagoner, and a female in general. Cobb came into one of the topics about the Lakers or Clippers, and said he hopes the Clippers get their ass beat in the first round. Was he trolling? I don't think so. http://www.discusshoops.com/forums/topic/33692-how-many-games-will-the-lakers-win/page__view__findpost__p__373146 Why didn't you go in there and call him a troll?

I don't like the Lakers, you don't see me going into Lakers threads and posting "Go [insert team name]" unnecessary baiting. Post count, is that how we judge the quality of this site? Post count has been a problem for 2 years, not gonna change, we aren't random forums who thrive off post count, we are forum that thrives off the quality members who keep coming back despite the lack of activity. How is the site better? I'm sorry I won't answer rhetorical questions, ask just about any member not a on foreign IP they'll give you a straight up answer. Worst part is, I even like the guy, just don't like his conduct. n

I was rooting for the Pacers, also. The site was better without him? The post count didn't reflect that. We were less active when he was suspended. If he was truly the problem, I'd think everyone would have picked up their activity, but that wasn't the case...at all. How is the site better?

@Brandon "Real Deal" Neal How am I supposed to see shit like this in random gameday threads and not troll? Seriously? The site was better with this guy not around. There I said it.

Jim Buss was on the phone at 710 AM. He feels they can turn it around and make the playoffs, and if they do, they will go deep in the playoffs because just making the playoffs would mean they are playing very well near the end of the season and have the momentum necessary to do well in the playoffs... He's a bit overconfident, to say the least...

10/10, especially since she talks sports.

More JaVale! http://25.media.tumblr.com/f407ce4e7a076d2bbfc64c84204850b5/tumblr_mfnlecw3aZ1qcmnsoo1_400.gif http://25.media.tumblr.com/8c0007ea003196499f97378d2f3d9740/tumblr_mfnlecw3aZ1qcmnsoo2_400.gif

Matty Ice melts in the playoffs doe

http://i49.tinypic.com/10ztxcj.jpg

Hahahaha honey nut cheerios

http://www.csnne.com/basketball-boston-celtics/celtics-talk/Knicks-Anthony-waits-for-Garnett-by-team?blockID=821079&feedID=10424 LOLOLLL

Just saw this, was one of the better Bond movies in recent years. Not quite as good as Casino Royale (one of my favorites of all time), but MUCH better than QoS. Kept thinking of No Country for Old Men whenever I saw Silva, lol. Awesome movie.