EastCoastNiner

I saw this list about a week ago, and the funniest one by FAR is Juwan Howard. . He made som serious money when he was younger.

It contradicts nothing. There is no SUBSTANCE there. All you do is list articles that you can't understand the meaning of. It does not show WHY those numbers where what they were. Next time someone posts an articles from Fox News or another more conservative group, I'll make sure to tell you that you shouldn't question it because those journalists and reporters are higher up in the chain you are. That's how it works for you, right? I mean, if it's a well known person, and they don't agree with your opinion, you're going to admit they are right and are extremely intelligent because they have "credentials"? Works for me. Also, you're far more narrow minded than myself. I can keep an open mind (not open to Obama for the most part), but you're probably the most closed minded person here. So, do you mind telling me the reason behind those Clinton numbers, or are you just going to post articles that don't show the reason as well? The only thing Clinton left with when he left office was a lawsuit.

Are you serious right now? That growth was due to the tech boom you moron. It's funny how you post the most biased and uninformative articles you can find. Oh, and it's no surprise that Cohan is another liberal sheep considering he's from MA. I'm lucky enough to not have been sucked into their garbage propaganda. You're usually smarter than this, so I'm surprised you posted an article that doesn't tell you WHY those numbers are what they are. It's due to the tech boom and Clinton loosening regulations on banks. That's not really refutable. Even though the article does not seem to place Obama in a good light, I wouldn't use that article against Obama at all right now. I think it's poorly written, and has no substance within it. Go ahead and list Cohan's credentials....I don't care....this is a poor article. I'm getting off topic here, but not once have I ever said I love George W. Bush. However, with Obama, he's just failed to deliver on his PROMISES. You can say all politicians promise things, but if you can't deliver on them, then expect to receive shit.

I'm surprised I missed this post. You must not follow politics or anything at all because Clinton was not too popular when he entered office at first. I know you're not bragging about him here, but I've seen you mention him all too often in the past, and I never addressed him much. Many sheep like to believe Clinton was great and whatnot, but the economic "boom" when he was in office was do the the tech boom and internet boom, not because of his policies. The "tech bubble" popped right before Bush entered office in 2000. You are always about regulation and everything, yet you do know Clinton was the one who relaxed the rules on the banks, which gave idiots a way to buy houses they could not afford causing a false boom? You do know what the "fair housing act" is, right? You do know who signed that in as well, right? The one thing I can agree with you on (I think you've said it before), is that no President of the U.S. can completely control the economy. When you have hundreds of millions of people spending money in this country each day, it's tough to deal with. However, that doesn't mean you have to spend, spend, spend, and sign in stupid laws (that are unconstitutional). I never really understood why you like to mention Clinton a lot, even though you've only mentioned him once in this thread.

Are those the same men that Obama said he was going to have out of there as soon as he went into office? . Please go.

Anyways, I hope Romney can get the votes he needs. It would be funny to see him lose the popular vote, but win the electoral.

They have the 2012-2013 DROTY on their team in Chandler Jones. He is going to be better than JPP (srs).

Once again, proving why liberals are stupid. Do you realize how many of the people that you quoted are actually liberals? Seriously, you quoted the VP of the DNC. . Yes, I see you mentioned a conservative or two in your post, but I'm not sure what it's supposed to prove. Seriously, that was a weak ass post from you. I expected better from you. (srs).

Eastwood did not embarrass himself. It's funny how much smarter Republicans are than Democrats. There's more intelligence in that one building than there is with liberals worldwide. Liberals should just be moved to North Korea. Anyways, it's probably going to be four more years from Obama, but tonight made me feel better about Romney's chances.

Clint Eastwood owned Obama's dumb ass earlier.

I can't wait for this to be fixed and "changed". http://winteryknight.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/obama_record_november_2011.jpg

MITT!!!!!! Here he comes!

This is bound to get locked soon and I'm going to bed now. If it's still open tomorrow I'll be back to try and knock some more common sense into you. I'm sure you'll be home all day tomorrow collecting unemployment though, even though you're probably and able bodied human being.

You're under the impression that the stimulus package was somehow a great thing, but it wasn't. The idea of a "stimulus" and printing more money is [expletive]ing retarded. You seem to think it's a great idea when the country is in major debt....to well.......keep spending and put us into more debt. And, yes, Obama contributing to a record breaking debt is PRETTY [expletive]ING IMPORTANT!

I'm not sure why you're focusing in on this as I never said he was doing a good job with unemployment, jut that Obama has failed at a national level, but I wouldn't expect you to understand that. Isn't it weird that I'm not here saying Christie should blame everyone for his problems that he has? Wow, a think a liberal would be shocked to know that they don't have to blame everyone for their own problems.

Just as I thought. Blame Bush for this. Blame Bush for that. Typical liberal response. They can never blame or fault Obama for anything. Let me ask you this since you can't seem to comprehend the difference between what Bush "contributed" to the defect versus what Obama has done. Has there ever been a President that spent as much as Obama and put us in as much debt as he has. Cool, go ahead and say Bush gave Obama a deficit, but Obama has put us in a MUCCCCHHHHHHHHHH [expletive]ing larger hole with his spending and debt. What you're saying is similar to this: Someone is caught speeding and gets a ticket because they've broken the law. Someone is convicted of murder, and goes to prison because they've broken a law. They must be so similar because they're both illegal. That's not the case though because one is FAR worse than the other. Seriously, I'd expect nothing less from you than blaming everyone except Obama (like I said you would and you've proven me right).

Also, I'm not defending Bush and his more liberal spending habits. He was conservative by nature, but his spending was questionable.

"Landmark" doesn't mean it's good. It's terrible, absolutely terrible, and I'd like to know what you actually know about his awful bill that few people actually read. The shit is so damn long it's absurd that it was passed.

This is a typical response from the Obama sheep. I acknowledge Christie and NJ have unemployment problems, and that he is a conservative governor. There's not much I can really say about that without being completely hypocritical. Back to blaming Bush you go. Obama has done FARRRRRRRRRRRRR more damage to the economy and put us in FARRRRRRRRRRR more debt than we were with Bush. You can't give Obama credit for one thing because you think he does well at it, and then go back and blame Bush for every Obama failure. That is my biggest peeve with the Obama sheep. They want to say, "Oh, he is doing so well and has helped this country so much" if he does something positive in some minds, yet when he does something (almost everything) poorly, it's somehow Bush's fault. It's all about the blame game for liberals, but it's typical of their mindset......no personal responsibility at all, and want everything handed to them. It's going to be funny if Obama is re-elected (which I fear he will be), what you will be saying four years from now with his failed promises. Will you still keep blaming Bush and everyone except Obama (The one question I want you to answer the most)? http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v215/lowbridge/225178_10151197112708784_628444801_n.jpg

And, no, Romney is not perfect at all, but I'd rather take a chance on him than the disaster that Obama has proven to be. Failed promise after failed promise.

I'm aware of Christie and NJ's unemployment rate, just like I'm aware of how Obama has been nothing short of a colossal failure. Can you tell me how the national unemployment rate is? Can you tell me how much debt Obama has gotten this country into (go ahead and try and blame the republican party)? I'd love to know the answers to those questions. Obama has failed on FARRRRRRRR more than he he succeeded on, which is minimal success, if any. He's all talk, and sheep like you just vote for him because of "change". "College graduates should not have to live out their 20s in their childhood bedrooms, staring up at fading Obama posters and wondering when they can move out and get going with life. “ -Paul Ryan (Future VP) Edit: Holy [expletive], I didn't notice you mentioned his "landmark healthcare" legislation, which is a DISASTER. I can't believe you said that.. Oh, he prevented another "Great Depression"? No, just no. The stimulus was [expletive]ing retarded, and I just can't take you seriously right now because it's so obvious you are just a blind sheep. I know lkr disagrees with a lot of conservative views, but at least he's rational.

What did your boy Obama do? Nothing at all except failed promises. Strong unemployment numbers under his watch. Or, are you going to try and blame the previous administration? Please go you sheep.

The Patriots are surely going to get worse after improving their offense and defense while having the easiest schedule in the NFL. Strong logic.

http://newsimg.ngfiles.com/263000/263886_1327178511203.jpg

Yes, I'm aware.