EastCoastNiner

I know that has been your stance for a while, and I'll respect that, but I completely and utterly disagree with your view. Such a heinous and inhumane act deserves inhumane punishment. I'm trying not to let my emotions get the best of me, but at the very least he needs to be put to death, soon.

I wonder how many people want him to go to jail top be "rehabilitated". This guy deserves nothing except a few shots right to his head. However, before he gets the shots to the head, he should be tortured for weeks.

Well, Shea Weber just signed an offer sheet with the Flyers, so we'll see if Nashville matches.

Typical New York retards. "Durrr, you should have stayed here. Durrr, we made you. Durr, we loved you here" "Oh, you totally suck even though we're mad that you left and wanted you to stay". Typical New Yorkers.

The most overrated pitcher in the MLB. He's lucky he plays for the Angels, or else he'd be exposed like none other. It's really amusing how he is absolutely nothing without the giant rock pile during the day-time. He's 3.5+ era pitcher if he doesn't have that advantage. . http://i.imgur.com/Uw41i.png http://i.imgur.com/8IIyQ.png http://i.imgur.com/rVe5N.png

I wonder how many people think the woman abusing and drunk driving guy is still a great role model? .

What a loser he is. A straight a bum. Strong role model this fool is.

Yes, it is completely possible, and once again, you avoided the question at hand, and want to turn it into something else. There are plenty of people that would rather see their tax dollars go to charities than the government. Why doesn't Buffet give more tax money to the government? Edit: I'll talk about this in the random thread or not at all. I don't want to create any more off-topic threads for a while.

You have both proven to be illiterate. I did not say anything about helping charities, as I specifically mentioned taxes. And, I'm positive I was talking to one of you about the foundation a month or so ago. Learn to read, and then get back to me. Can you show me where Warren Buffett decided to donate more TAX dollars to the U.S. government? I know you'll try and hinge your entire argument on the "less fortunate" part of my post which was clearly about TAX dollars.

It's interesting you post that because there was a story yesterday about Facebook making a decision of whether or not to notify people when their pictures have been viewed, and by whom they were viewed by.

Liberals always want people to pay more in taxes to "help" people out, yet the super-rich liberals never do. All they have to do is write a check to the government if they truly care about the well-being of the less fortunate or not as successful. Warren Buffet is the #1 example of the most hypocritical super-rich liberal.

I don't know how reliable this source is, but I've seen some people talking about it. http://www.clickorlando.com/news/Sources-Houston-making-plays-for-Howard/-/1637132/15500010/-/vhw244/-/index.html It would be Ibaka+Harden for Howard......... I'm not sure what to think of it. You'd assume that the Magic would want to dumb some of their shitty contracts with Howard........

I don't agree with that stance...........

I know people in MA that would have actually voted for the legalization of gay marriage had it gone to a proper vote, but many people do not like that it did not go through the proper process. That is what many people dislike.

Yes, I will explain my thought on this. Personally, I do not think that gay people getting married is bad. I would probably support it IF the legalization of gay marriage goes through the proper process. I just want to clear that up, once again. Now, onto your question. Over the years, the media has really tried to make it sound like the majority of people support gay marriage, even the vast majority of people. However, time after time, voting shows that the majority of people do not support gay marriage. Many people do not believe that it is "normal" behavior to be gay. Now, I do think things are changing and that more and more people are starting to support gay marriage (I have no facts off the top of my head to back that claim up), but the votes have not indicated that. This is one article briefly talking about the actual support, or lack thereof, for gay marriage. http://www.usnews.com/debate-club/will-obamas-support-of-gay-marriage-help-him-politically/state-by-state-americans-dont-want-gay-marriage Now, I've also read articles that state that most people do support gay marriage, but at the end of the day, that is not what the votes are showing.

Are you even reading what you are quoting? I compared two ideas, so you are correct on that. I said I was comparing two IDEAS that are out of the norm. I am not comparing a pet to a human in any way, shape, or form. Yes, the acts are similar because they are out of the norm. You really have reading comprehension problems, and want to try and twist a definition to fit your thought, which is incorrect. Comparing two out of the norm ideas does not mean I am comparing a human to a pet. If you can't understand that, you should go back to pre-school.

No, actually it is not comparing a human to a pet. It's comparing two different "out of the norm" (many people consider being gay as out of the norm) acts to one another. It is not comparing a human to a pet no matter how you want to illogically try and connect it.

com·pare   [kuhm-pair] Show IPA verb, com·pared, com·par·ing, noun verb (used with object) 1. to examine (two or more objects, ideas, people, etc.) in order to note similarities and differences: to compare two pieces of cloth; to compare the governments of two nations. Was I comparing two different species? Nope, not at all. I was never comparing the dog to a human being. It was an example of something that would not be the "norm". (Being gay isn't they "norm"). 2. to consider or describe as similar; liken: Shall I compare thee to a summer's day? Did I ever say dogs/pets and humans were similar? Nope, I said the act of marrying a pet and being a gay person and getting married are both out of the normal social "norms". 3. Grammar . to form or display the degrees of comparison of (an adjective or adverb). Not comparing humans to a pet, but two situations that may not be considered normal/right by many. You should have learned this by your 40th birthday or however old you are now.

Are you that mentally retarded? Not once did I compare a human to a pet. I provided a possible scenario about a human marrying another specie , but as usual, you can't read and try and take things out of context. Asking if you have a problem with a human marrying a pet is not COMPARING a human to a pet. Do you not know what a comparison is? You should have learned this sometime in elementary school.

Not remotely similar, besides there being animals other than humans involved. I'm not comparing the intellect and way a human acts compared to a duck and many other species. My example, although far-fetched, was more about the choice to do what someone pleases. Again, not even similar.

This stuff is pretty crazy. http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshhy58LhVD2Wb18okW8

Further proof that your linked article is a bunch of shit, and tries to stretch everything.

This isn't even worth responding to. You're comparing ducks and other animals to human beings. . What's the amount of HUMAN reproduction that occurs when a penis goes into the vagina? I'd really like to hear from you. You're trying to use every living specie known to man to try and make your numbers look like they matter at all, which they don't at all because humans are not alike with much of the species you want to compare them to.

That doesn't prove anything or even disagree with what I have said. Penis into vagina = biologically normal If you want to argue that people are programmed to be gay, that's fine, but that doesn't mean it's biologically normal. .

It's not biologically correct. That isn't even debatable. Now, I don't care what gay people do, but to call it biologically normal/right is factually false.