Jump to content

EastCoastNiner

Player
  • Posts

    7,453
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Everything posted by EastCoastNiner

  1. Yes, it's called an "Account To Account" transfer.
  2. I know it's not all Australians that support this, but it seems like there are a fair share that do. . http://www.news.com.au/national/abortion-outrage-mums-should-be-allowed-to-terminate-newborns-say-australian-academics/story-e6frfkvr-1226286841396
  3. Another awesome headline from ESPN. I can't wait for the politically correct crowd to start crying about it. http://deadspin.com/5889679
  4. Both sides are in the wrong here for different reasons. Clipper Darrell is sure as hell no innocent victim here. He would lose any case in court without a shadow of a doubt.
  5. No, you only have to be 18 to use it. Legality for U.S. laws will require you to be 21, but screw that.
  6. Dat balance at the bottom. <_< . Too bad its no more. . http://i44.tinypic.com/2lm7215.png
  7. Damn, I have not been able to sleep well the past month or go a little while without thinking how badly I messed up. I really can't believe I burned $30,000 in short timespan, then deposited another $6,000 and blew it all.
  8. http://cdn100.iofferphoto.com/img/item/176/438/041/five-5-roosevelt-dimes-1976-34c99.jpg
  9. Anyways, if the Clippers have to take legal action, Clipper Darrell will lose as he's legally in the wrong. If there was no "Clippers", there would be no Clipper Darrell either.
  10. I could understand where the Clippers are coming from in regards to a person representing himself as a part of the Clippers organization (in a way) and making money doing so. However, the lost me when: 1. They never seemed to give a shit when the Clippers were complete garbage from many years. They ONLY acted once they started to see that someone was making some money (presumably) while somewhat associating himself with the team. 2. The Clippers organization has a history of being classless and complete liars. 3. The one line in the article claiming that he wasn't a real Clippers fan. The letter wasn't too bad until that part. Right there, right then, they lost it. You don't need to fire a jab like that at someone who has supported your piece of shit franchise for many years.
  11. http://chzichcafterdark.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/funny-pictures-pundit-kitchen-after-dark-lol-didnt-read.gif Will read later though, although I did read the last paragraph and already know based upon that, that I will not agree with you at all. Pretty much since more white people don't live in "ghettos", minorities should be given special treatment. Nope!
  12. Not to mention that Braun is a total sleezeball for lying about the Fedex situation. I hope he has a terrible rest of his career.
  13. He failed both tests, and pretty much every qualified expert has claimed that Braun is 100% a cheater, and that the samples were not tainted.
  14. Why shouldn't they do this if it exists in other work fields and education fields? Oh, because it doesn't suit your interest? (Assuming you support AA).
  15. He's a cheater. He found a garbage loophole, and got out of it. After hearing the statements from the handler of his test, it's 100% obvious to any objective person that Braun is a cheater. You're just a homer that wants to say, "Well, he's not a cheater because they over-turned his case on some garbage", yet that has nothing to do with him actually failing the test. Also, Braun is a lying sack of shit about the whole Fedex ordeal. The handler couldn't jus drop the box of at any Fedex. He had to go to one that was open, and there weren't any in his a vicinity. I'm looking forward to Braun getting sued. He's a cheating POS.
  16. Should NBA teams be required to have the following? -Four African Americans -Three Caucasians -Two Asians -One Native American -One European (not white American) -One Pacific Islander Or, are you all on that hypocrite time?
  17. If Kobe does have a concussion, then the league should force him to sit multiple games......
  18. I have to give Howson credit for not just taking the best offer he received, and waiting for a great one even if he's not there as GM next season. He knows he may be on the way out, and for him to not just take the best deal he had, and hope to wait for a better one in the off-season is very respectable.
  19. I would love to know what part of that offer would be worth it for the Blue Jackets. Dubinsky is nice, as a #2 piece of a package. There's no potential high end talent there (most likely). Again, Sather made the right move, but that package was not that good
  20. That's not a good offer. Yes, Dubinsky is nice, but Nash could fetch more than that. It's basically a bunch of spare parts with some potential. I don't blame Sather for not offering more either because there's no way in hell he should have offered more. It's going to be interesting to see what the Rangers locker room is going to be like now............I'm hoping to some tension. Time for them to self-destruct.
  21. Good on Howson for turning down the rumored pile of crap that the Rangers offered for Nash. I personally don't think Nash is that great, but Dubinsky, Erixon, Miller, Thomas, and a 2012 1st is a shitty ass offer. Rangers, please go.
  22. This was an All-Star game. There's no place for that crap that Wade pulled. I also find it hilarious that you are calling Kobe fragile when Wade is far and away the biggest wimp in the NBA. There's no defending him fouling Kobe as hard as he did, regardless of a broken nose or not.
  23. Good thing no one is saying he tried to break Kobe's nose. What has been said is that Wade meant to foul Kobe hard, and Wade said that himself. So, when you realized you were not going to win this argument, you decided to try and change the words of what people here are saying, but that's not slipping by anyone.
  24. Wade said he was trying to foul Kobe. Those are his own words. He was crying because he claims Kobe fouled him twice that game, so he wanted to get a good shot in.
×
×
  • Create New...