EastCoastNiner

Dwayne Wade.....please go. It's been painful enough to watch you ride Shaq's coat-tails and now LeBron's. You're jelly as can be about Kobe, which is exactly what your quotes showed last night. The foul was certainly intentional as well. Over/Under: 6 1/2 game until Wade's in a wheel-chair for two months? I can't stand him. He's a punk.

This guy is the biggest loser in the NBA. Brb, let me foul Kobe and break his nose. Brb, let me cry and claim that Kobe fouled me twice already. Brb, let me break a toe-nail and sit in a wheel-chair for two months. On Kobe passing MJ On his hard foul on Kobe U mad, Wade? Go ride the coat-tails of another superstar so you can win another championship you bum.

Malkin Stamkos Giroux H. Sedin D. Sedin Kessel Spezza Kovalchuk Parise Kane Hossa Toews Datsyuk St. Louis Gaborik Getzlaf Perry Iginla Selanne Eriksson Kopitar Vanek Crosby Tavares Ovechkin Backstrom E. Staal There's 27 players off the top of my head that are without a doubt better players than Nash. We're not talking who will be better in two years, we're talking who's better now. Nash is not better than any of those players. You're just looking at him being a #1 overall pick, that in actuality, is a major underachiever.

You guys are finally noticing that Wade is a loser?

Please, do tell me what Nash adds that Kane does not add. It's nothing. Nash is not elite. I know you're a Leafs fans ad probably wouldn't know an elite player if they were right in front of you, but Rick Nash is not elite. Patrice Bergeron has more 70 point seasons than him, and had piss poor line mates when he entered the league. Rick Nash's point differential between him and his next few top scoring teammates is not that of an elite player. Rick Nash is not elite, nor is he close to an elite player. He's not a top 30 player, and not even close to a top 20 forward without a doubt.

Also, I just noticed you were seemingly questioning Malkin's heart. I love the Russian stereotypes that Russian players have no heart, or fold easily. If a Canadian star isn't producing, it's a "slump", but if a Russian is struggling, it's called a "lack of heart". It's truly funny. Oh, and Malkin's perceived "lack of heart" (you generalized the Russians, like I did Canadians) is another way of saying "battling through injuries". And, by no means do I dislike Crosby or think he's overrated. I think he is an amazing player, but I just like what Malkin brings to the table a little more.

You're the one that said it wasn't close between the players. Those are your words, not mine. I have said it for a long time that I believe Malkin is better, and I believe he is showing why these past few months. Crosby may have the better ppg, but watching the games, it becomes apparent that Malkin can take over a game better than anyone in the NHL. If you think Crosby is better that is fine, but to say it's not as close as I want to make it seem, is flat out laughable. After this season, Malkin will have more important NHL hardware than Crosby as well. He'll most likely get his second Art Ross Trophy, and will probably get the Hart.

Just use a debit card....

Malkin's been given far worse line mates than Crosby his entire career while being played out of position often times as well. He finally has Neal, who is 5050505050 times better than Steve [expletive]ing Sullivan. Malkin hasn't had the luxury of having Letang on the blue-line the entire season and a much better transition game like Crosby has had the luxury of his entire career. Malkin's had to come back from injuries more times than Crosby, and still has an excellent ppg. Hell, if he wasn't injured as often as he has been, his ppg would certainly be much closer to Crosby's, if not better. Watch them play because you obviously don't if you claim there's no augment. Malkin is much stronger on the puck and can take over a game in ways Crosby can't do, and that's nothing against Crosby. It's nice that Crosby had to ride Malkin's coat-tails in the Penguins last Stanley Cup run. It was awesome that Crosby beat up on the Senators in earlier rounds, or his points would not be that impressive during that playoff run. Malkin will finish his career with more Hart's, Art Ross's, and Conn Smythe's than Crosby will. Honestly, you're just a biased Canadian. Any Russian star will be less than any Canadian star in most Canadian's eyes, especially when you say Crosby is better and that there's "no argument". Please go.

First off, Hossa>Gaborik, and to say Nash is better than Kane is flat out laughable. I hate the Canucks, but D. Sedin>Gaborik. Oh, and I know you meant Nash>Burrows, and if he it, it's minimally. I'm putting Ryan on the first line. That's why it's called the RPG line, and position by position, the Ducks beat the Rangers line in every way. And, those "other" line with "two really good players" put with another player are still better. Malkin and Stamkos are so much better than any player on the Rangers 1st line that they make up the difference themselves. I like Gaborik a lot, so I may take that comment back, but Richards and Nash are not "elite", period. Oh, and your biggest mistake and is calling a player that has reached 70 points one time in his career "elite". . Elite players produce no matter who their line mates are, and certainly hit 70 points more than once in their career. Nash is not that good, period. He is a first line winger, but he is FARRRRR from elite.

They're non-existent.

I only placed $100 on that game for the Patriots to win against a spread of - 42 1/2 to win $17,000. I blew it all before the game. I'm sure Kevin and Pat Williams could have used some of that money to get some more of that HGH.

I had $30,000 in my online sportsbook account in the middle of January, and pissed it all away by the end of January. I then placed $1,000 in six more times and blew it all. I can't deposit again until March because I've reached the monthly deposit limit. I'm going to deposit one last time and see what happens.

I honestly think Malkin is without a doubt the best player in the NHL, even with Crosby healthy. Malkin's been stuck with garbage for most of his career until he got Neal on his line this year, and he's been tearing shit up. He hasn't had Letang all season this year as well, in addition to many luxuries that Crosby has had during his career. He's too damn good, and he can singlehandedly win the Penguins as Stanley Cup this year.

The 2012 Olympic Team without a shadow of a doubt.

Also, are we just going to sit here and act like I'm not a wizard when I told you Malkin>Crosby? What Malkin is doing now is more impressive than what Crosby did last year in multiple ways.

First off, Richards is not that good, and is vastly overpaid. Anyways, teams with a better first line without thinking twice: -Chicago -Vancouver -Anaheim I could easily add Pittsburgh with Malkin+Neal which is probably a better line alone than some of the teams I listed above. I could also easily add Stamkos+ St. Louis and Washington's top line if Ovechkin would step it up. Nash is a 70 point player, and is not worth near what he is paid. I hope the Rangers give up a shit load for him.

How about, no? There's three lines that would certainly be better, and that's just off the top of my head.

John Hollinger, please go. That guy is the biggest turd there is. Tell me wheat types of shots Dwight Howard can create on his own? He doesn't scare any team on the offensive end. Great, he can put back shots, but teams are not afraid of him offensively, nor should they be because he sucks on offense. Seriously, don't list any type of John Hollinger stat again. That guy is a fraud. If you're going to use PER as your main argument, then you would have to believe that Kenneth Faried, Marcin Gortat, and Brandan Wright are all borderline all-stars because that's what John Hollinger's ratings say! .

And, most are you are smoking Dwight's......... D12 is as overrated as they come. You can't build a championship team around that offensively inept fool.

Bynum will without a doubt be better than D12.

So, what the hell are you talking about then. You know that he got off on a technicality or whatever you want to call it. He didn't get exonerated of what he was accused of because of the evidence. He got off because the MLB dropped the ball. He's a cheater and a disgrace to the MLB. Everyone knows he's a cheater and won't be buying the whole, "Oh, but the appeal worked for him, so he didn't cheat" garbage. Everyone knows he got lucky as hell. Cheater,

http://incorrectbasketballknowledge.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/shaq-and-kobe1.jpg?w=470

I found this on another forum, so don't get too offended...... http://i.imgur.com/a7w21.jpg

This guy is going down the drain. He won't be returning to Texas. http://eye-on-baseball.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/22297882/34975703