EastCoastNiner

http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/805096-im-afraid-haynesworth-just-made-me-giddy.html HE....IS....COMING!!!! And, HE IS HUNGRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 30+ may also be the number of times the Patriots tackle a Dolphin behind the line of scrimmage.

The Patriots will beat Miami by 30+ on Monday.

My team is going to beast. Nobody will be scoring on NE, and NE will force 3 and outs on defense like crazy. Brady will have hte ball for 45 minutes a game, and throw for 50+ TD's this year, with Gronk getting 15.

Well, here is the first major trade of this FF season. To ECN: Brady Grobkowski Lynch To Fish: White Dez Tony Gonzalez

It would start with Rivers+McCoy. I would have to think it over, but I may be willing to do that if you are. I'm really high on both players you want, and have been trying to deal them for a top tier QB, but I'm really hesitant to trade Dez because I have a feeling he will explode this year. I legitimately think he will be one of the five best WR's in the NFL fantasy wise this year. And, with Jackso, the Rams are looking pretty good, and he'll get a lot of goal-line carries. Rivers is not my first choice for a QB, and I have other potential trades in the works, but he does interest me. It just depends what you are willing to give up because I do like my team for the most part. I have an elite HB, an HB that should get some good touches, and excellent WR depth, with two possible studs starting in Bryant and White. I have no clue what to expect from Alex Smith because there are more offensive weapons for him this year, but if he does poorly, I can kiss any chance of winning goodbye!

Also, my team is so beastly. Once I grab Gronkowski in a deal, it's all over.

What would you want for Manning .50?

He's NOT touching him in the picture you showed. That is where you are wrong. He...is...not...touching...him..in....that...picture. You're using a picture that you're wrong about as some type of evidence. . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0_Jv63msfw It couldn't be any clearer.

Not to mention the Westboro Baptist Church is going to be picketing the 9/11 memorial. They are going to get seriously hurt if they do go, and I doubt the police will do everything they can to help them.

I just saw the replay again and you are 100% completely and utterly wrong. Hawks hits the ball first. It should not have been PI. Also, the just said that on NFL Live as well that it was the wrong call. You're picture also doesn't show anything. I thought it was PI at first, but it definitely was not.

I hadn't looked at the Giants schedule before today, and all I can say is good luck. The Giants are a good team, and the games are played on the field, but that schedule looks rough. The first few weeks are no walk in the park. Playing in Washington could be tough, and I think the Rams are going to be a pretty damn good team. The Giants need to take advantage of week 4-8 because after that, on paper, it looks to be an absolutely brutal stretch of games. It sucks that the Giants have to play at New England, New Orleans, and New York (maybe not a big deal), and those are some of their toughest out of division games. I'm not even going to venture to guess what the Giants finish. I can honestly see a six win season, but I can also see a ten win season. Injuries suck, and hopefully they don't hurt the Giants too much.

I'll start off by saying I've barely even talked about this series on otr and wasn't bragging or anything when the Bruins won, so I'm not trying to troll or stir up anything. I'm not saying you think that, but I'm getting that point out of the way. Now, I disagree with you. If there's a top team in the Western Conference that the Bruins matched up well against, it was the Canucks. The Sedins have never been able to do anything about Chara. Also, the games the Cancuks won, they won low scoring games, so the addition of Hamhuis didn't matter too much in those games because the Canucks won. I just don't see any way that Hamhuis is going to single handily change Vancouver's defense (I understand certain players pair better with others), and change the following scores in Vancouver's favor. Game 3: 8-1 Game 4: 4-0 Game 6: 5-2 Game 7: 4-0 Those are all four of the losses that the Canucks had in that series, and none of those games were close. The problem was Luongo sucking big time in those games, and Tim Thomas playing like an animal. The Canucks, on paper, have a very nice top six, but the Bruins really smoke them with the bottom six. Even though on paper Boston doesn't have as much firepower in their top six, they are very good defensively, which negates what Vancouver can do with their top six. However, Boston's bottom six is excellent, and quite possibly the best in the NHL, and that plays a major roll. It also didn't hurt that Krejci decided he was going to be a goal scoring machine, Marchand decided to be a playoff beast, and Tim Thomas was flat out amazing. I would not be surprised if there was a re-match in this year's Stanley Cup Finals. I know physicality isn't everything, but this past Stanley Cup Finals really showed me how much playing a physical game can really hurt the opposing team. The Canucks should have another very good regular season, but we'll see how they do in the playoffs. It's going to be a very competitive Western Conference. There's the Kings, Sharks, Blackhawks, Red Wings, ect. That conference is going to be an absolute dog fight, but I think Vancouver can pull through.

No. I only listed to about two minutes total from all of the videos. I wasn't sitting through all of that. . Canucks in 3. Amirte? .

Why the [expletive] did they run it?!

Did anyone see that official slap Brees' hand? .

I didn't want to make a new thread, and I wasn't sure where to put it, but Tony Gallagher and Jason Botchford are the two most annoying, pompous, arrogant, and stupid people I have ever heard speak. http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=978439 SOOOOOOOOOO ANNOYING! Also, I know Tony Gallagher was the moron that wrote an article saying the only way the Canucks would lose is if the NHL was on the Bruins side because of Campbell, and bitched and moaned about it. That guy is so damn annoying.

Where's the ejection?

Damn, I really don't want to root for the Packers, at all. Whatever. Hopefully the Saints suck this season.

The ones that stand out to me that I disagree with are the following: -Buffalo will win more than four games -New England will not regress record wise from last season. There's a better chance of them going 16-0 than 12-4. -I think you're short changing the Ravens big time. -There's too big of a drop off in the records for some of the divisions. -I don't think there's any way three teams win 10+ games in the NFC South. -The Packers will NOT repeat. The good: -St. Louis looks like a good prediction. -Miami will be poor, but I think they'll be worse than you're saying. There's more good ones as well, but they aren't just amazing predictions which is why I didn't list them. I can't argue with too much off the top of my head.

That's a pretty good offer. What would you want for Gronkowski and Brady?

I don't want to watch two bottom feeder teams play the first game of the season..... Honestly, I don't know who I want to win. I hate the Packers, but the Patriots have the Saints first round pick............

Count me out then because I'm not doing a draft after the first game of the season has been played. Hopefully someone can take my place.

The draft is set for Thursday at 10:30. . Nope......not happening.

What the hell? Are you going to make a draft time or what? I doubt Yahoo! lets you make it 10:30 E.T. right now. I bet the earliest you can do it is like 11:00 E.T.

Da fuk? There's only seven people in the league.....