Erick Blasco

I never had a chance to post this, so I'll post it here. Since NBA point guards carry the most responsibility on the court, the position is widely considered the most important position on the court. Point guards not only must have talent, but have to understand every aspect of their team’s gameplan, and what defenses are trying to do to stop them. They must be reliable since they generally have possession of the basketball more than other positions, and they must know the ins and outs of everybody on the court—teammates, opposing players, referees—so that teammates are put in the best position to succeed, and opponent’s weaknesses are exploited. Oh and since, opposing point guards have the same responsibilities, being an ace defender is also a must. This list does not take into account a player’s future prospects or past salad days. The criteria is simple: Which NBA point guard would be best suited to winning a championship with a random collection of starting-level talent. For example, if Andris Biedrins, Pau Gasol, Joe Johnson, and Courtney Lee are your teammates, who would you want as your point guard? Due to the way some NBA lineups are presently constructed, a handful of potential point guards will be asked to play different positions this year. For that reason, Allen Iverson, Delonte West and Jason Terry are listed as shooting guards this year. No rookies made the list, as neither you nor I have seen them play in meaningful games against meaningful competition to know where they should be ranked. With the prologue out of the way, on to the list. 1) Deron Williams—Utah Jazz Before Chris Paul’s legions eviscerate me, consider what Williams would be able to do with a system that allowed him to be the point scorer, or assist maker on nearly each of his team’s possessions. Williams is both explosive and strong which allows him to always get into the paint, and subsequently, do more damage once inside. Williams may not be as quick as Paul, and Paul is a very strong guard in his own right, but Williams’ size, body, speed, and leaping ability, allow him to assault the rim and finish through people. It’s an element that shouldn’t be underappreciated. Williams can also play off the ball and is an excellent post player, again, overpowering opponents with his size. He’s one of the league’s premier passers, throwing, arguably, the second best bounce pass in the game behind Steve Nash. He’s also a much better dribbler and passer than Paul using his offhand. Williams’ three point jumper is spotty, but his midrange pull up jumper is one of the most advanced in the league. His ability to score one-on-one is also much more advanced than Paul’s, who usually needs a screen to start his offense. Williams has the keys to the most complicated offense in the NBA, and Utah’s scoring output has been extremely successful under his command—no small feat. While that has as much to do with coaching (and Byron Scott’s lack of coaching) as anything, consider New Orleans’ simple screen/roll or double screen/roll gameplan. If an opponent takes away New Orleans’ screens (something Denver did exceptionally well last postseason, for example), what can Paul do but isolate, something he isn‘t exceptional at? If Williams’ base offense is taken away, he knows how to get into other options, something Paul can’t do. Defensively, Williams doesn’t get as many steals and doesn’t have the anticipatory skills that Paul has, but he’s a better screen defender, simply by the fact that he doesn’t give up on screens nearly as much as Paul does. He also gambles less, and is out of position less often. You can’t go wrong with either stud, but the ability to finish, the mastery of a more diversified offense, and the fewer defensive mistakes give Williams a slight edge in my eyes. 2) Chris Paul—New Orleans Hornets The best speed guard in the NBA, the best screen/roll player in the NBA, arguably the best point guard in the NBA, Paul’s game is a symphony of superlatives. He has incredible natural talent—pure speed, agility, leaping ability, shiftiness, and strength despite a small frame. He has refined skills—wonderful court vision, a high basketball IQ, anticipation on both ends of the court, a perfect right-handed dribble with more trickery than a three-card-monty dealer. He has total mastery of his team’s gameplan and excels in screen/roll situations. Paul’s flaws that keep him behind Deron Williams are minor. He’s neither as tall nor as strong as Williams, and subsequently isn’t as dominating a finisher. He’s also a worse screen defender, and his rambling, gambling style that can be taken advantage of by disciplined defenses. His left hand is appreciably worse, and he’s vulnerable to being trapped hard while driving left. Paul’s ability to run an offense is less extensive because of New Orleans’ system. Also keep in mind, Paul’s numbers inflate because of the needs of New Orleans, compared to the needs of Utah. The Hornets need Paul to score or assist on nearly every possession, while Utah can afford to spread the ball around more. Also, while Paul’s rebounding numbers are exceptionally high, and a testament to his toughness, it comes at the expense of Paul not leaking out in early offense to lead a potential fast break. Williams has poor defensive rebounding numbers, but Utah generates more transition baskets, factors that go hand-in-hand. Also, Paul isn’t competing with Andrei Kirilenko, Carlos Boozer, and Paul Millsap for defensive boards, especially when Tyson Chandler was injured. Either way, Paul is a legit superstar with potential MVP-worthy talents. 3) Tony Parker—San Antonio Spurs Blessed with electrifying speed, Parker is virtually unstoppable one-on-one. He’s probably the fastest player in the sport and breaks his man down in isolations better than any other point guard out there. Parker is a good passer who knows how to run an offense, though his instincts are to attack. His jump shot has improved over time, though it’s still only average. It’s the one area in his offensive arsenal that keeps him from being a dominating, MVP-caliber player. Though Parker’s small, he’s fantastic at taking a hit and completing a play, possessing a championship-level toughness that supersedes a lack of raw strength. He’s a good individual defender who can stay in front of most opponents, and like anybody who has earned premium minutes under Greg Popovich, is an excellent team defender as well. Williams and Paul are clearly the class of the point guard position, but Parker isn’t as far behind as people realize. 4) Rajon Rondo—Boston Celtics Rondo’s evolved into the best defensive point guard in basketball. With his tremendous speed, and incredible wingspan, getting around Rondo is like getting around the Great Wall of China. Rondo will gamble on screens more than his coaches would like, but his rangy hands allow him to poke away dribbles as well as anybody. Offensively, Rondo’s a tremendous facilitator who keeps improving as a finisher and a leader. If he ever consistently learns to knock down jump shots he’ll be scary on both sides of the ball. 5) Chauncey Billups—Denver Nuggets Billups has made a career out of posting smaller guards, pulling up over slower guards, running an offense expertly, and playing sound defense. His leadership and experience was a calming influence on an extremely excitable Nuggets team, helping to add discipline to a wildly talented roster. Billups actually wasn’t as disciplined as the rest of his teammates last season, taking a lot of bad shots early in the shot clock. However, on a team that emphasizes a quick pace and a controlled havoc, Billups’ ability to shoot over 40 percent from downtown is an asset, even if some of those threes are transition pull-ups. Defensively, Billups was the leader of Denver’s wing screen-trapping defense that decimated a number of opposing offenses. He’s not a particularly quick guard, but he’s strong enough to take away the post, and smart enough to be an excellent help defender. Just how good is Billups? According to where the Nuggets and Pistons were with and without him, he’s worth two extra playoff series. 6) Steve Nash—Phoenix Suns Nash may still be the league’s most potent offensive point guard. Nobody passes better than him, not Paul, not Williams, nobody. Try running at full speed and throwing a perfect bounce pass with zip to a streaking cutter from half court to inside the free throw line—with your off hand. Nash makes it look like a rudimentary skill. Besides his passing, Nash is one of the best shooters in the league, has brilliant court intelligence, sees everything, and is a clever finisher. Why isn’t he ranked higher? As good as he is on offense is as bad as he is on defense. Not only is incapable of being even just a bad defender, his aversion to a slower, more defensive-minded style of play was a major factor in the firing of Terry Porter, and has been a major factor why the Suns haven’t been able to take the next step and earn a trip to the Finals. One-way players aren’t Top five players. 7) Derrick Rose—Chicago Bulls A sparkling youngster who will someday join Chris Paul and Deron Williams as the best point guards in the game. Rose has prime-time athleticism—speed, strength, height, and major ups. No other point guard besides Williams combines speed, power, and the ability to play above the rim the way Rose can. Rose sees the floor like a veteran and is an excellent passer and decision maker, especially for someone so young. His jump shot and defense need work, but the expectation is that he’ll improve considerably in those areas before everything is said and done. It’s doubtful he appears this low on a top point guards list until a very long time. 8) Devin Harris—New Jersey Nets Harris really blossomed last year as a scoring point guard. New Jersey gave him a chance to be their team’s leading playmaker and he took off. He’s always been fast and shifty, but his jump shot and defense have improved considerably since he first came into the league. He’s not a physical scorer, he’s not a great team defender, and he’s not a world-class distributor. In a league of dynamic point guards, those nitpicks are the difference between being very good, and being exceptionally good. 9) Andre Miller—Portland Trail Blazers A difference maker due to his leadership and court vision, Miller creates offense with his eyes, brain, and will. There are players who see the floor as well as Miller does, but none who see it better. He’s able to manufacture points just by seeing defensive mistakes, mismatches, and opportune angles. He’s one of the best transition point guards in the game because of his ability to finish and his masterful decision making with the ball in his hands. When the game slows down, he can post anybody and has a deadly midrange pull up jump shot. His defense is poor and he has no range, but Miller’s one of the most underrated point guards in the game. Few players can do with as much with less like he can. 10) Gilbert Arenas—Washington Wizards A point guard in name only, Arenas dominates the ball, takes awful shots, plays zero defense, passes only as a last resort, and doesn’t improve his teammates. He’s a wonderful streak scorer, but little more. 11) Jason Kidd—Dallas Mavericks By finally learning how to shoot, Kidd has salvaged his career. He’s not explosive enough to get to the rim in a halfcourt set anymore, but he still sees the floor beautifully, makes perfect passes, and excels on the break. By being able to knock down threes, he remains a dangerous offensive weapon. Defensively, Kidd’s lost a step and a half and the premium point guards in the league blow by him at will. However, he’s strong enough to defend smaller two-guards and is a bear in the post. 12) Jose Calderon—Toronto Raptors Calderon can run an offense with anyone. He’s a good pull-up jump shooter, and an extraordinary free throw shooter. He doesn’t do anything he shouldn’t and is a very efficient player. However, there is a certain degree of creativity a star point guard needs, and Calderon doesn’t have it. 13) Maurice Williams—Cleveland Cavaliers Mo Williams is a scoring point guard with a history of not being able to score when it matters most. He improved his defense last regular season, but was exposed in the postseason as a poor defender. His ability to put the ball in the basket as a second option was invaluable to the Cavs last season. If he can duplicate that success in the postseason, Cleveland can win a title. If not, he’ll be hard pressed making it this high up on the list again. 14) Jameer Nelson—Orlando Magic Nelson is a strong point guard, with a jump shot and moxie. He played with confidence last season and his production skyrocketed to All-Star levels. He’s a creative finisher that can finish with contact, and he has no qualms about making big shots in big moments. His edges still need to be rounded out, and he’s not a dazzling athlete, but he’s turned himself into a valuable point guard. 15) Kirk Hinrich—Chicago Bulls It’s easy to forget, but Hinrich does so many good things for a team. He’s one of the best defensive point guards going, both on-ball and as a helper. He can run an offense as a passer, or look to attack as a scorer. He’s a dependable shooter, and can play the two-guard in a pinch. Not overwhelmingly talented, Hinrich makes the most out of what he has. 16) Rodney Stuckey—Detroit Pistons Stuckey’s strong, talented, defensively tough, and has a scorer‘s confidence. He has trouble running an offense and he could work to improve his three-point shooting, but both areas should improve with experience. 17) Monta Ellis—Golden State Warriors Which Monta Ellis will show up this season? The 2008 version who was ultra-quick, could get to any spot on the court, and scored in bunches? The 2009 post-injury version who had no bounce, was two steps slow, and couldn’t score enough to offset his horrible defense and offense-running skills. If Ellis’ athleticism hasn’t returned all the way, he won’t be an offensive star, and since scoring is the only thing he does, he won’t be much of a player. 18) Baron Davis—Los Angeles Clippers Talented, selfish, moody, all are adjectives that describe Davis. Two seasons ago, His uneven play down the stretch saw him benched by player-friendly Don Nelson. Last season, he didn’t even bother, and turned in an embarrassment of a season. If he cares, he’s a top ten point guard, easily, but his history of me-first, self-centered play isn’t worth the trouble. 19) Aaron Brooks—Houston Rockets Brooks is a pint-sized scorer who can get off his own shot anytime, and will fight on defense. He’s not a good passer yet, and he’ll always be a defensive mismatch against big guards, but talent and toughness are good qualities in a young player. 20) Mike Bibby—Atlanta Hawks Bibby has no quickness anymore and never was a good defender. He’s still a dangerous jump shooter who will knock down big jumpers at big moments of a game, and is a smart player. With his age and deteriorating athleticism, he’ll drop down the list with each passing year. 21) Derek Fisher—Los Angeles Lakers Fisher may be the slowest point guard around nowadays, but he knows how to run the triangle offense perfectly (a talent in its own right), shoot, and defend bigger guards. And with a game in the balance, is there anybody you’d rather have shooting the ball than Fisher? 22) Steve Blake—Portland Trail Blazers Blake is a good shooter, an underrated athlete, a smart floor general, and a passable defender. He’s a capable starter, who becomes an outstanding backup. 23) Rafer Alston—New Jersey Nets Alston has come a long way since his all-style, no substance NBA beginnings. He does a good job of running an offense, has decent quickness, is a decent defender, and can shoot. However, when the lights shine their brightest, for all Alston’s yapping and barking, his game becomes awfully quiet. 24) Raymond Felton—Charlotte Bobcats Felton has reached his plateau as a decent player on both ends, but hardly special in any category. He can run an offense, is an acceptable defender, and has good athleticism, though he can’t shoot consistently, and isn’t a terrific finisher. He’s a useful low end starter, though he’d probably be best off as a backup. 25) Russell Westbrook—Oklahoma City Thunder If running and jumping were the only criteria a point guard were judged on, Westbrook would already be an All-Star. You can tell he’s a newcomer to the position by his inexperience running an offense, and like all young players, he makes a lot of mistakes on both ends. Still, you can see that he’s a defensive playmaker by his long arms, quick hands, and anticipation. Offensively, Westbrook needs to improve his awareness and his jump shot, but by being fearless, he draws tons of fouls careening to the basket. He has a bright future in the league. 26) Chris Duhon—New York Knicks Duhon does a lot of things well. He’s a very good defender for his position, can shoot the three reliably, will drive and dish, and will take care of the ball. He’s best off as a backup, but before running out of gas last season, did a fine job steering their ship. 27) Louis Williams—Philadelphia 76ers Williams can score, but isn’t terrific at running an efficient offense, or setting teammates. He has talent, but he’d be better served in a backup role. 28) T.J. Ford—Indiana Pacers Ford’s selfish, puny, defenseless, and a poor shooter—a list of traits you don’t want on a point guard. 29) Mario Chalmers—Miami Heat Chalmers is an aggressive defender who will rack up a bunch of steals over his career by hawking the ball. He’s still learning how to run an ofense on an NBA level, and he’s very mistake prone, but aggressive players usually do better in the NBA than passive ones. 30) Shannon Brown—Los Angeles Lakers Brown really burst on the scene during last year’s postseason. He’s both athletic and strong, can shoot, finish, and defend. The question is if he can do it all on a consistent basis. This article originally appeared on ballerblogger.com

This was one of the worst NBA games I've ever seen. Charlotte needs Raja Bell real, real bad right now. And the Knicks need a clue.

I'm going to go with Airness himself, though I wouldn't disagree that Iverson's was better.

This may have been the best defensive game Dirk Nowitzki's ever played. Active hands, on balance, securing rebounds, being in the right place, he played terrific. Add Marion, get Antoine Wright's lack of talent and Josh Howard's flakiness out of the picture, and the Mavs played tough. Impressive win.

Uh oh, Maggetteios!

I'd be surprised if he's still on the team at the end of the season. With his contract, the Bucks are desperately looking to shed salary and get talent back. He'll probably be Milwaukee's next casualty.

He actually doesn't make any bold predictions about playoffs or anything. It's a lot of in-depth scouting.

I, and most people, agree with his assessment on O'Neal simply because it's been so long since he's proven he can stay healthy for a full season. Toronto fans expected him to be a top contributor too last year, and then the nagging injuries stepped in, and he only contributed one or two good games every two weeks. He's healthy now. What makes you think he'll stay healthy besides blind faith? I think Chalmers can be a starter, even though the scout disagrees. I think Chalmers' athletic traits and defensive hunger can solidify and create a good starter. He has to get smarter though. I don't agree with him on Cook though. I've never seen anything from him that makes me think of him as a valuable rotation player aside from some streaky three-point shooting.

Sports Illustrated's Scouting Takes on all 30 teams http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/basketball/nba/main.scout/

lol at HG and at Wali's response. Congrats kid, and keep up the good work.

You have a lot to learn about Stephen Jackson my friend: http://www.nba.com/bulls/news/smith_091019.html?rss=true http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/10/13/SP301A55O5.DTL http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=aw-cohanwarriors101209&prov=yhoo&type=lgns There's a lot more and a lot worse said about Jackson, but I don't feel like spending four hours at 2 in the morning looking for it.

I don't think any aspect of Nelson's gameplan is wise, and having two tiny guards is no exception. They'll get killed defensively in the backcourt, but Nelson doesn't care about that anyway. Off the bench, I'm not sure if Golden state has the talented finishers Curry can set up, nor is Curry good enough to consisently get his own shots off. I don't think Curry will turn out to be that much better than the one or two guys Golden State calls up from the D-League every year that puts up 30 to 40 points in a game.

He shot just 6-22 against the Lakers and is shooting less than 33% this preseason. He shot less than 40% during the summer league, and doesn't appear to be an athletic finisher, or an accurate shooter. Surprisingly, his point guard skills appear to be his best attribute.

I wonder if he still feels that way now that it looks like Curry can't get his shots off against NBA defenses.

Last year, he began to put things together. His passing ability is better than anyone's expected, and he even played great defense for stretches. He has tons of baggage, but he's as explosive as Wade and Kobe. All Smith has to do is to keep growing up. Many of the players behind him are streaky, chuckers, or immature too, notably Terry, Gordon, and Howard, and none of them come close to Smith's explosion. Neither Carter, nor J-Rich can match Smith's defense. If Smith keeps making strides he needs to make, I'll give him credit for it.

The Heat are a mediocre team, expecting them to be third is borderline crazy. They needed Wade to go out of his mind just to post a 5 seed and a first round exit. Now, the middle of the conference is slightly improved and the Heat are supposed to jump? And Orlando is supposed to fall that low? Haslem's solid, but why do you like Dorrell Wright so much? He's done nothing to show that he can be a rotation player in the NBA. Chalmers is mistake prone, and Quinn is a third stringer playing second string. Daequan Cook has done nothing to show that he's little more than a streak shooter. Beasley will be playing a position he's never played before, never passes, and can't defend. Joel Anthony is a solid defender (and the Heat play better with him as opposed to Jermaine) but nothing more. O'Neal is as soft as they come. What makes you think the Hawks didn't get better. Their roster is young and should all improve internally as well. Washington has added some firepower. The Magic are explosive offensively and sound defensively. I'll never count Wade out, and Miami is sound defensively but they won't be a top three team next year. They have below average starters/question marks/inexperience at too many key positions.

I'd bet that Lawson plays about 6 minutes a game this season. A team with title hopes isn't going to give big minutes to a rookie.

lol, I know :glasses:

Not any random yahoo, but the mathematical formulas that determine adjusted plus/minus ratios. And the random yahoo is a very respected ESPN writer, Henry Abbott of TrueHoop.

Discipline's more important as a point guard. You have to know how to get everybody on the same page and in the right places and you can't make too many dumb mistakes. It's why I like him as Denver's backup. For an unstable roster, he doesn't make dumb mistakes, he's a decent enough defender, and he has a very nice assist to turnover ratio. Of course Kobe and Wade ill eat his lunch, they're Kobe and Wade!

Nice job by Stu Jackson and NBA.com with a clear video rulebook. LeBron's "crab dribble" is visually confirmed as a travel. Video Rulebook

Carter's also the only guy they have with any sense of discipline other than Billups. He's fine as a backup, though I'd also like to see Affallo start at the two.

Wow, that's lower than I expected. I don't think they should be chaotic, but their strengths are their teamwide athleticism. They should run as much as possible. On the other hand, they're not a great defensive team or rebounding team. That makes it a bit harder for them to run.

I did say Carter can do nearly anything ^_^

Two very good post players, a talented, but inefficient offensive small forward, and a bad point guard. I'm going to need someone else who can run an offense, and a good team defender. My scoring should be fine with two legit post threats, plus Thornton. West is perfectly fine as a fourth option. He was Cleveland's third option after all. What team am I facing also? I'll take the players listed and use their opposites according to the lists I've made: C: Andris Biedrins PF: Troy Murphy SF: Danny Granger SG: Rip Hamilton (let's use the player directly above West and Carter) PG: Deron Williams I don't love the idea of Carter trailing Hamilton around screens, and Biedrins is athletic enough to make Carter change his mind at the rim. However, I'd just be posting those guys all day long with my frontcourt and don't need much perimeter scoring. Thornton can score on Granger anyway, so my offense is fine. I'm going to need a lot of help defense on Williams and Granger, and I don't need a third guy in Carter who'd get killed defensively. Give me West.