His Greatness

Not quite. The jury is still out on Eddie Jordan, but that hiring is (probably) Stefanski's only significant slip-up.

Oh [expletive] [expletive] [expletive]ing [expletive] [expletive] a [expletive] [expletive] damn [expletive] [expletive] no.

LOL storybook ending. Cutler is great.

What a boring game. This feels like the WNFL.

'01 - 5th '02 - 2nd '03 - 4th '04 - 4th '05 - 10th '06 - 21st '07 - 29th '08 - 23rd '09 - 23rd Now - Last Oh Iverson.

Sweet! Squeaked out a win with the aid of a questionable call against a depleted basketball team. 4-4!

The fact that Oher now plays right tackle kind of dilutes the effect of the title.

Hendrix? You mean Prince?

If Iverson really wants to play his own way, why doesn't he go overseas? He can put on a show for Europe's uncorrupted fans who are so accustomed to fundamental basketball. Add excitement to your basketball!

It's working, but how slow is Orton's release? He throws like he's in an action movie.

Kris Brown can split the uprights on a 56-yarder, but he misses from 41. No W for Houston, but what a second half performance.

Moving screens are legal in the NFL. He'll love it.

I hope Terrance Williams was on birth control.

Come on. It's been six games, and Wade's universally accepted position in the top three is already being challenged? Carmelo's assembling quite the season, but let's see him maintain this pace for 76 more games and not unravel in the postseason for a change. /no homer

He's not ready to start. Besides, it's four games in. Relax.

He's crafty enough to gain separation consistently one-on-one, but it's improbable that he maintains that efficiency. No one could. Good thing basketball isn't played one-on-one.

Of course you would because you're taking him out of his element and forcing him to operate with a hindrance. That goes for every player. The numbers might take a dive, but their ability doesn't. Nash's numbers took a dive in '04 because of the Walker and Jamison acquisition. It had nothing to do with Nowitzki's scoring output. Stoudemire missed all of '06, when Nash averaged a career high in points. In the 26 games Nash played without Amar'e last season, Nash averaged 19 points. So there goes that theory. There's a difference. A product of an offense would be Marion, who isn't a quality contributor on offense without a high-paced offense and a playmaking point like Nash, whereas Nash just thrives in that type of offense. That playmaking ability, court vision, shooting prowess, and bad defense is still all him.

Remove any cogs from an offense, introduce a hindrance and the numbers will inevitably dip. It doesn't diminish a player's ability. You can't accurately evaluate any players by nitpicking.

What? No... but how is any of that relevant? You said Nash is a product of the offense.

Um, screens are a fundamental aspect of every offense. Your other points might be valid, but that's absolutely ridiculous.

Angles like that from Sharper are part of why he wasn't re-signed by Minnesota.

[expletive] you I'm jealous.

I wouldn't say it comes at the expense of a potential fast break. A large portion of those rebounds are long, but that's besides the point because they play at such a slow pace that I would venture to say any difference is insignificant. I think Byron Scott discourages transition offense. Ramon Sessions is a noticeable omissions from the list. Did you forget him, or is Shannon Brown better?

If the Celtics win 70+ games, LeBron will win MVP. If the Celtics win 82 games, LeBron will still win MVP.

Where is the rest of the GIF where Manu falls on the floor and the officials call a charge on the bat?