YugoRocketsFan

There is no way he is better than Brooks. Brooks has scored in the 30s vs top teams, including in the playoffs.

I was laughing @ iggy being 10th, which means I think he should be higher.

Well Lets see They have Tyreke Evans, Carl Landry, Spencer Hawes. So either a PG or another wing player. Al-Farouq Aminu would be nice at SF, since the Kings are very tall.

I dont hate Kobe, I am just telling the truth. Kobe gets as much superstar calls as LeBron or Wade do.

Brooks hasnt been struggling at all. Hes been doing his job, scoring every night, hitting 3s and dishing. its hard to argue against stats? Then why do you say Kobe > LeBron? Ariza also never was a 1st or 2nd option, he has always been 3rd, now with Martin he is maybe a 3rd or 4th option, since Brooks, Martin and maybe Scola are in front of him. I dont know what negative response you are talking about, Im befuddled. But ya, lets look at this way, nearly same stats. Rockets 32-31, Warriors 17-46

Thats rly your list? LOL. Artest @ 6? Josh Smith is too high, and Iggy at 10 lol.

Warriors play fast-break basketball, while Rockets dont, and plus, Aaron leads the league in 3 pointers, he is the better scorers but his playmaking has been improving, but anyway. Brooks > Curry.

Refs help Kobe as much as LeBron.

Jordan Hill beasts again, assuming tha Carl Landry role, 11 points, 7 rebounds and 2 assists, BEAST.

We look so much better with everyone back, cant wait for David Andersen to return also.

No they arent. Brooks is better as of right now, in the future you dont know because neither player has reached their ceiling.

The one that went to the finals, because they actually got to the finals, the current Mavs wont unless the Laker's airplane crashes with the whole team inside.

lol potential goes long ways, many people said Brooks would be an ok starter one day and now he has the ability to be an all-star. You dont know a player's potential, if a young players has a skillset like Jordan Hill, he can do be either a scrub or an all-star, so I wouldnt just say, OMG HE WILL BE A DECENT STARTER AND THATS IT.

He died in 1997. Thats 13 years.

Spring break is coming up lads. Its already tuesday, have to do an exam and a 4 page essay tommorow . But I dont mind too much because SPRING BREAK is here, oh boy how relaxed I will be and I will be job hunting right after Spring Break, get me some money cause I am going to Europe during summer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtWBoI-UVNc

Which probably wont ever happen.

I dont think they defended eachother much, but I think LeBron would have the upper hand because of his physical ability.

And LeBron is way faster, more athletic, is bigger, longer. LeBron could take Kobe in the post.

Yah but the girl at your school probably was just a lot better while Kobe and LeBron are the same calibre of players.

You guys are taking their personal skills in general not against them, Kobe might be good defensively but he cannot shut down LeBron, one on one usually comes down to who is more athletic and agile, and therefore I pick LeBron.

Im anxious to see more of Jordan Hill.

When you have like 80 million in expirings, you will defenitely be focusing on every player. I still think it'd be hilarious to see the Knicks get nobody.

5, 50 sounds about right. 4,45 would work, 10 a year is a great for a player of his calibre.

Well thats one thing I just wouldnt pay attention to haha, he is pretty agile though, hopefully Rick keeps giving him minutes because he actually has talent and some skill, and he is better than Chuck Hayes, thats for sure.

http://ballersfb.nike.com/basketball_content/profile_images/aaron_brooks_1257268184.jpg 19.9 ppg 5.2 APG Only 2.85 turnovers per game in 36 mpg. Which is pretty decent for a young PG. People have to start adding him to top 5 lists.