Dash

I remember that dreadful day clearly. Its hard to believe its really been 8 years... RIP It was good of you to make that banner Brandon, things like this are why I have much respect for you. Props.

Interested in seeing OTR's opinion. As for me, 'yay'.

Link So if this happens, no Joey Crawford and Violet Palmer? :o

^Well he's still months away from being 100% so we'll see. 7:30 is where Tracy gets the ball a lot more.

Link For a guy coming off microfracture surgery he looks pretty good.

Wow looks like someone already forgot the 2003-04 season.

They were under McHale. I'd say Milwaukee, Clippers (Sterling, enough said) and Warriors.

Halo 2.

If anything this signed increased your playoff chances. What does Memphis have to lose exactly?

Win-win trade. Minny saves 4.8 million in 2010, add a veteran defensive presence to mentor Sessions/Flynn, and get a 2nd rounder to boot.

Kahn is amazing.

Thing is, the next best scorers are Marc Gasol and Mike Conley.

Good signing, this team has the potential to make the playoffs but they'll have to work out some chemistry issues.

Good [expletive]. Repped.

I drank once at a wedding thinking it was coke Other than that I'm clean.

Southeast Asia American.

These are amazing.

Looks like a pretty good movie, I'm going to check it out this weekend. Anyone else going to see it?

Anthony Randolph Spencer Hawes Mike Conley Yi Jianlian Marco Belinelli Martell Webster Greg Oden Javal McGee Hakim Warrick Jerryd Bayless Brandon Bass Roy Hibbert DJ White

We talk about the Spurs consistency but what about the Lakers? Not regular season but playoffs, a higher win percentage and being in 60% percent of the decade's finals isn't considered consistent? You can also argue that the Spurs had the luxury of playing easier opponents than the Lakers. The Lakers had to get past the Adelman Kings, Blazers, etc while the Warriors knocked out the Mavericks for SA in 2007. Take out 1999 and the Spurs have 19 playoff series wins as opposed to the Lakers 23. Hold it, the Lakers were irrelevant for 3 years and still have won 4 more playoff series than the Spurs? :o

Playoffs of course, Lakers even got the better end of the Spurs in most of their meetings. Agreed on the final appearances (look at post below). I posted the stats including 1999 because that was apparantely where the debate was going. I don't know why considering the topic title is 'Better team this decade"... If the Spurs win the title this upcoming season than they have a pretty good argument. Your welcome, that did take a while to put together.

The Lakers presented sheer dominance during separate parts of the decade while the Spurs were far more consistent. I think I'll give the edge to the Lakers, 6 Finals appearances is enough said.

Its a 12 - 14 hour game, worth a rent only.

Longhorns and the Houston Cougars.

Spurs Worst record: 53-29 (1999-2000) Best record: 63-19 (2005-2006) 1st in division: 7 times (1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2009) 1st in conference: 4 times (1999, 2001, 2003, 2006) Key injuries: Tony Parker (44 games total), Manu Ginobili (96 games), Tim Duncan (53 games), David Robinson (26 games). Regular season record: 613 - 257 (70%) Playoff record: 98-59 (62%) Playoff series won: 23 NBA Finals: 4 NBA Championships 4 Lakers Worst record: 34-48 (2004-2005) best record: 67-15 (1999-2000) 1st in division: 5 times (2000, 2001, 2004, 2008, 2009) 1st in conference: 4 times (2000, 2001, 2008, 2009) Key injuries: Kobe Bryant (72 games), Shaq (57 games), Pau Gasol (56 games, only played 27 games with Lakers in 07-08), Lamar Odom (55 games), Derek Fisher (86 games) Karl Malone (40 games) Regular season record: 561-309 (64%) Playoff record: 101-50 (67%) Playoff series won: 24 NBA Finals: 6 NBA Championships: 4