OldChili

Compared to the first it isn't. I'll probably go see it a week after it comes out.

It's amazing how well Hill continues to play at the age of 37. Better?

It's amazing how well Nash continues to play at the age of 36.

Lol you guys are making a bigger deal about the elbow than LBJ is.

I... agree with you? :o

Ambrosio by far for me.

What the [expletive]?

I think Yugo already posted this.

What did you think of it? I saw it a while back when it first came out, and I liked it a lot. Great acting.

Haha, I love Mourinho. What a beast.

I'd imagine there would be scratches on the wood or at least some indicator animals lived there...

Camby obviously fouled Nash with his eyes.

Finally, a three for Carter.

Man, Carter hasn't made a three this series.

Cavaliers would still be a decent team, possibly 7-8 seed out in the East. I don't think the Nuggets would have any chance of making the playoffs.

Good post, I would probably fit the Magic in there somewhere. Nelson, Carter, Lewis, Howard, Williams

I'm confused.

Yea, he's been pretty impressive. Only negatives are that he's shooting 50 percent from the free throw line and committing almost four turnovers a game.

Yea, I like it a lot. Definitely better than Safari, in my opinion.

Thunder had seven more rebounds, four more steals, three more blocks, and three less turnovers. There were 30 fouls called on the Lakers, and 23 on the Thunder. In game 2, there were 30 fouls called on the Thunder, and 26 on the Lakers. Despite that, the Thunder had one more free throw attempt. Once again, the difference was that the Lakers committed many shooting fouls.

While there have been questionable calls, I don't think the Lakers should be complaining. They've received their own fair share of treatment over the season, and the Thunder are just outplaying them at the moment. They've been quicker to rebounds and have been playing with much more urgency. Lakers are still going to win the series, though.

No one is arguing that. I'm just confused what your intentions were when you made this thread. To me it seems like you're trying to show Kobe shoots well when he takes a lot of shot attempts, but that really isn't the case. You left out games he shot over 30 shots (on purpose?), and didn't include games he shot 20-24 shots, which is still a lot of attempts.

It would be a great signing, no doubt.

Why not include games he shot over 30 shots? vs. Cleveland 11-33 (.333), 35 points vs. Cleveland 12-31 (.387), 31 points vs. Portland 14-37 (.378), 32 points And here are when he attempts 20-24 shots... bold is over 46%. vs. Thunder 9-22 (.409), 31 points vs. Hornets 11-21 (.524), 28 points vs. Phoenix 13-21 (.619), 29 points vs. Houston 5-20 (.250), 18 points vs. Chicago 7-21 (.333), 21 points vs. Thunder 11-23 (.478), 26 points vs. Knicks 14-20 (.700), 34 points vs. Warriors 8-20 (.400), 20 points vs. Utah 7-24 (.292), 16 points vs. Nets 12-23 (.522), 29 points vs. Bucks 11-23 (.478), 28 points vs. Houston 9-23 (.391), 22 points vs. Bucks 4-21 (.190), 12 points vs. Clippers 10-20 (.500), 30 points vs. Knicks 8-24 (.333), 27 points vs. Raptors 11-24 (.458), 27 points vs. 76ers 10-22 (.455), 24 points vs. Celtics 8-20 (.400), 19 points vs. Nuggets 11-22 (.500), 33 points vs. Dallas 9-23 (.391), 20 points vs. Bobcats 9-21 (.429), 26 points vs. Raptors 11-20 (.550), 32 points vs. Atlanta 12-21 (.571), 28 points vs. Utah 5-23 (.217), 25 points vs. Spurs 8-24 (.333), 22 points vs. Blazers 8-23 (.348), 20 points Kobe shot over 46% in around 38.5% of games where he shot 20-24 shots. Kobe shot over 46% in around 66% of games where he shot over 25 shots. But only 25% of those games were against teams with over 50 wins. 41.6% of those games were against teams with over 45 wins.