moeroadkill Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 (edited) i don't see why u guys think he would go to bulls. he would be living in the shadow of Michael. did you all forget about him? if Lebron wants to be the best his gonna have to win 7 rings at the very least. he already hears it about having no rings already going to Chicago will make it 10X worse and i dont think he will go to Clippers but if i were him thats were i would go. i honestly cant pick where he will end up Edited May 14, 2010 by MoeRoadKill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliCurbStomppa Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 Bron' shouldn't go to Chicago because someday when he win a championship and win many individual awards people always gonna think MJ first. It prob be Knicks or Clippers maybe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sun Tzu Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 I'd like to see him play for Chicago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Multi-Billionaire Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 It really depends on individuals. Some guys don't like to live "under the shadow" of a great player. Some guys are so competitive they don't ever think they're under the shadow of anyone, even the GOAT. Like LeBron is a great player himself... even if they say he's in MJ's shadow, he shouldn't feel that way because he knows he's a great in his own right. MJ or no MJ. To some, it's burdening to fill legacy, but to some it can be inspirational. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastNiner Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 You guys are all wrong. He is going to be a New Jersey Net before he'll ever been a New York Knick, and that's for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NomarFachix Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 Yeah man, I heard he loves the [expletive] out of Newark, New Jersey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newman Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 Knicks, not because they're a better team than the Cavs or whatever (because they certainly are not at this moment), but because LeBron can control which players to get and become team-mates with considering the free cap space and the trade pieces NY have (Danilo, Wilson Chandler, Toney Douglas) and also because New York is one of the biggest city in USA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 (Danilo, Wilson Chandler, Toney Douglas) Pieces? You mean average role players. Gallinari is the only one who could maybe become something other than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guru Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 http://katchop.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/lebron-nets-copy.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dash Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 The Untouchables30. Jazz29. Pistons28. Pacers27. Raptors26. Bobcats25. Bucks24. Grizzlies23. Celtics22. Nuggets The Impossibles 21. Hawks20. 76ers19. Spurs18. Wizards17. Wolves16. Suns15. Warriors14. Blazers13. Hornets12. Kings11. Rockets The Improbables 10. Magic9. ClippersThe Not Beyond The Realm Of Possibilites 8. Mavericks7. Thunder6. Heat5. Nets4. Lakers The Genuine Candidates 3. Cavaliers2. Knicks1. Bulls Read more: http://realgm.com/src_feature_pieces/904/20100514/the_lebron_james_power_rankings/#ixzz0nvoj7dnc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Regime Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 Lakers lol wtf!!! No way in hell do I see us getting LeBron. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lkr Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 he's gonna retire Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NomarFachix Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 Pieces? You mean average role players. Gallinari is the only one who could maybe become something other than that. You don't watch Knicks games, don't try to evaluate their players. Kthx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 You don't watch Knicks games, don't try to evaluate their players. Kthx. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that the Knicks roster is utter garbage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren2ThaG Posted May 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that the Knicks roster is utter garbage. I like David Lee and Wilson Chandler a lot hun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NomarFachix Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that the Knicks roster is utter garbage. This is your response? Come on guy... watch them play and know how to assess the players you're assessing, or don't do it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
misterx Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 Nobody envisioned Kobe and Artest on the same team. but werent they trying to get artest for awhile though? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.