trutrojan8 Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 10-1, 0.78 ERA, .90 WHIP discuss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HipHopHead Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 No, not really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly3rs18 Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 not at all. jimenez is a really good pitcher, but he isnt lincecum level yet. lincecum has been great for a couple years, jimenez has had potential but has only been great in his 10 starts this year. if he keeps that .78 all year then we can talk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phightins Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 Jimenez is [expletive]ing disgusting, but I still take Lincecum. And I still think Lincecum finishes this season with better numbers across the board than Jimenez, and probably wins the Cy Young. Lincecum is having some control issues right now but that will straighten itself out. One thing is for certain, seeing these guys go head to head frequently for the next decade will be a lot of fun (assuming the Rockies can keep Jimenez). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trutrojan8 Posted May 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 not at all. jimenez is a really good pitcher, but he isnt lincecum level yet. lincecum has been great for a couple years, jimenez has had potential but has only been great in his 10 starts this year. if he keeps that .78 all year then we can talkHis 0.78 ERA is like the 3rd best in the history of baseball through 11 starts. And half of those were in the biggest hitter's park in baseball. I'd take Ubaldo over Lincecum to build a franchise around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phightins Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 His 0.78 ERA is like the 3rd best in the history of baseball through 11 starts. And half of those were in the biggest hitter's park in baseball. I'd take Ubaldo over Lincecum to build a franchise around. Not to take anything away from Jimenez, but you are only saying that because you are a Rockies fan. I think most neutral fans would still take Lincecum (although that is up for debate as time goes on). If Jimenez proves me wrong and is better than Lincecum for a significant period of time, then I will reevaluate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trutrojan8 Posted May 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 Maybe it doesn't help that I'm a Rockies fan, but Jimenez certainly has the best numbers thusfar in the season in baseball history (or at the least top 3). Give me his 2 seam over Lincecum's changeup any day of the week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phightins Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 Maybe it doesn't help that I'm a Rockies fan, but Jimenez certainly has the best numbers thusfar in the season in baseball history (or at the least top 3). Give me his 2 seam over Lincecum's changeup any day of the week. There is certainly no doubting who the better pitcher has been thus far this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trutrojan8 Posted May 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 If we can repeat the 2007 season, I bet Ubaldo gets gypped out of the Cy Young by Roy Halladay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly3rs18 Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 Maybe it doesn't help that I'm a Rockies fan, but Jimenez certainly has the best numbers thusfar in the season in baseball history (or at the least top 3). Give me his 2 seam over Lincecum's changeup any day of the week. exactly, so far this season. that is definitely an accomplishment, but nothing more then that. you cant that a guy who has been good for 10 starts is better then a guy who has been good for a few years. it doesnt work like that. if jimenez finishes the season way better then lincecum then we can discuss, but until then it makes no sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erick Blasco Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 Jiminez' four-hit shutout just said F-U Lincecum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xx. Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 As of right now. I would definitely take Jimenez over Lincecum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 SSS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NomarFachix Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 Lincecum, please and thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly3rs18 Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 halladay > lincecum > jimenez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 halladay > lincecum > jimenezhalladay = santana > lincecum > jimenez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NomarFachix Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 halladay = santana You are out of your skull. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 You are out of your skull.Not at all Santana is still the premier pitcher in MLB, I am willing to be anyone a good amount of money Santana finishes with a better ERA than Roy Halladay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NomarFachix Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 Halladay > Lincecum > Santana > Jimenez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastNiner Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 Not at all Santana is still the premier pitcher in MLB, I am willing to be anyone a good amount of money Santana finishes with a better ERA than Roy Halladay I highly doubt he finishes with a better ERA than Halladay. He's a very good pitcher, but he's not better than the other three mentioned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliCurbStomppa Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 Santana isnt that good like he was in Minnesota. Hes still good but not better than he was a few years ago since he lost a step. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly3rs18 Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 Halladay > Lincecum > Santana > Jimenez agreed. all of these are pretty close though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted June 2, 2010 Report Share Posted June 2, 2010 I highly doubt he finishes with a better ERA than Halladay. He's a very good pitcher, but he's not better than the other three mentioned.If not for the worst start of his career in philly he'd have a 1.8 era this year... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NomarFachix Posted June 2, 2010 Report Share Posted June 2, 2010 If not for the worst start of his career in philly he'd have a 1.8 era this year... Can we discredit Halladay's subpar starts too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted June 2, 2010 Report Share Posted June 2, 2010 Can we discredit Halladay's subpar starts too?Just saying he's having a great year, don't have to be a douche after all my posts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.