EastCoastNiner Posted September 1, 2010 Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 You have them beating the Jets but losing to the Panthers and Falcons? wtf? I could see the Jets and Dolphins beating them as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted September 1, 2010 Report Share Posted September 1, 2010 Are you guys crazy? The Bengals have one of the best defenses in the NFL, if they win that division it'd be a huge disappointment especially with all of their weapons on offense. WK1: @ NE - WWK2: BAL - WWK3: @ CAR - WWK4: @ CLE - WWK5: TB - WWK6: BYEWK7: @ ATL - WWK8: MIA - WWK9: PIT - WWK10: @ IND - LWK11: BUF - WWK12: @ NYJ - LWK13: NO - LWK14: @ PIT - LWK15: CLE - WWK16: SD - LWK17: @ BAL - L lol @ ECN and the Bengals winning 5 games 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Regime Posted September 4, 2010 Report Share Posted September 4, 2010 (edited) Miami Dolphins: @ Buffalo- Win@ Minnesota- Winvs. Jets- Losevs. New England-WinBye@ Green Bay-Losevs. Pittsburgh-Lose@ Cincinnati-Lose@ Baltimore-Losevs. Tennessee-Winvs. Chicago-Win@ Oakland-Winvs. Cleveland-Win@ New York-Losevs. Buffalo-Winvs. Detroit-Win@ New England-Lose Final Record: 9-7 Carolina Panthers: @ New York-Losevs. Tampa Bay-Winvs. Cincinnati-Win@ New Orleans-Losevs. Chicago-Winvs. San Francisco-Lose@ St Louis-Winvs. New Orleans-Lose@ Tampa Bay-Winvs. Baltimore-Lose@ Cleveland-Win@ Seattle-Winvs. Atlanta-Winvs. Arizona-Win@ Pittsburgh-Lose@ Atlanta-Lose Final Record: 9-7 Edited September 4, 2010 by Confidence Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastNiner Posted September 5, 2010 Report Share Posted September 5, 2010 Patriots: 19-0 49ers: @Seattle -WNew Orleans-L@ Kansas City-W@Atlanta-LPhiladelphia-WOakland-L@Carolina-WDenver-WSt. Louis-WTampa Bay-W@Arizona-W@Green Bay-WSeattle-W@San Diego-L@St. Louis-WArizona-W I have them going 12-4, but it could easily be worse. I don't have a good feeling about the first game against Seattle, and I see Green Bay being the favorites in that game, but I think the 49er's can pull it out. I don't think their schedule is that tough at all, and they should be able to capitalize on that. If I was being a little more conservative, you could give the 49er's losses at Seattle, Carolina, and Green Bay, bringing the record down the 9-7....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastNiner Posted September 5, 2010 Report Share Posted September 5, 2010 I was correct. The 49er's have the 5th easiest strength of schedule. If they are going to take the next step, they need to stomp on the teams they should beat, and step up against some of the tougher team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted September 5, 2010 Report Share Posted September 5, 2010 49ers:I have them going 12-4http://sigsports.net/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/shaq.gif 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Posted September 5, 2010 Report Share Posted September 5, 2010 ECN, sorry dude, I just don't see you guys winning at GB late in the season. I'd say 10-6 or 11-5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lkr Posted September 5, 2010 Report Share Posted September 5, 2010 Not only will Cincinnati beat New England in week 1, but they will beat the Carolina Panthers, and will win more than 5 games. What a joke this thread has become Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastNiner Posted September 5, 2010 Report Share Posted September 5, 2010 Not only will Cincinnati beat New England in week 1, but they will beat the Carolina Panthers, and will win more than 5 games. What a joke this thread has become You're just mad because I [expletive] on you the other day when talking about Brady and Moss. Also, just to make it known for everyone. If the Cowboys don't win more games than the Patriots, Fish owed me $30 paypal. I doubt he'll pay though. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastNiner Posted September 5, 2010 Report Share Posted September 5, 2010 http://sigsports.net/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/shaq.gif That was my entire post. . That's the best case scenario. You should be the one nervous about owing me money after the Cowboys brilliant offensive showing in the pre-season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BasX Posted September 5, 2010 Report Share Posted September 5, 2010 Steelers... uhh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted September 13, 2010 Report Share Posted September 13, 2010 Dallas CowboysSun, Sept. 12 @ Washington (NBC) Sun, Sept. 19 CHICAGO (FOX)Sun, Sept. 26 @ Houston (FOX)Sun, Oct. 3 BYE Sun, Oct. 10 TENNESSEE (CBS) Sun, Oct. 17 @ Minnesota (FOX) Mon, Oct. 25 N.Y. GIANTS (ESPN/TXA 21) Sun, Oct. 31 JACKSONVILLE (CBS)Sun, Nov. 7 @ Green Bay (NBC) Sun, Nov. 14 @ N.Y. Giants (FOX) Sun, Nov. 21 DETROIT (FOX)Thu., Nov. 25 NEW ORLEANS (FOX)Sun, Dec. 5 @ Indianapolis (Fox)Sun, Dec. 12 PHILADELPHIA (NBC) Sun, Dec. 19 WASHINGTON (FOX) Sat, Dec. 25 @ Arizona (NFL NETWORK)Sun, Jan. 2 @ Philadelphia (FOX) 12-4Exact quote (I just added the bold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Penny Posted January 2, 2011 Report Share Posted January 2, 2011 Baltimore Ravens @ NYJ L@ CIN Lvs CLE W@ PIT Wvs DEN W@ NE Lvs BUF Wvs MIA W@ ATL W@ CAR Wvs TB Wvs PIT W@ HOU Wvs NO L@ CLE Wvs CIN WDidn't get the teams right, but got the 12-4 spot on :glasses: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChosenOne Posted January 2, 2011 Report Share Posted January 2, 2011 (edited) Why would someone bump this? I was really hoping no one would. Edited January 2, 2011 by ChosenOne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lkr Posted January 3, 2011 Report Share Posted January 3, 2011 Packers: @Philly - WBuffalo - W@Chicago - WDetroit - W@Washington - WMiami - WMinnesota - W@Jets - LDallas - W@Minnesota - L@Atlanta - WSan Francisco - W@Detroit - W@ New England - LGiants - WChicago - W 13-3not a terrible attempt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastNiner Posted January 3, 2011 Report Share Posted January 3, 2011 I think there's a good possibility that the Bengals only win 5 games. They should start off 0-3. We won 4 games in '08 with Ryan Fitzpatrick at QB, and Chad as his only reliable target. So that's pretty hilarious that you think we only win 5. That defense is too good and the offense is too explosive for them to only win 5 games. I'm not saying they will, but after looking at their schedule, I think there is real possibility that they only win 7-8 games, and it could be less. I could see them only winning six games, and that's with them beating the Jets and Dolphins. WK1: @ NE - LWK2: BAL - LWK3: @ CAR - LWK4: @ CLE - WWK5: TB - WWK6: BYEWK7: @ ATL - LWK8: MIA - WWK9: PIT - WWK10: @ IND - LWK11: BUF - WWK12: @ NYJ - LWK13: NO - LWK14: @ PIT - LWK15: CLE - WWK16: SD - LWK17: @ BAL - L WK1: @ NE - LWK2: BAL - WWK3: @ CAR - WWK4: @ CLE - WWK5: TB - WWK6: BYEWK7: @ ATL - WWK8: MIA - LWK9: PIT - WWK10: @ IND - LWK11: BUF - WWK12: @ NYJ - LWK13: NO - LWK14: @ PIT - WWK15: CLE - WWK16: SD - LWK17: @ BAL - L Thats how I see it. A minimum of 8 wins. Are you guys crazy? The Bengals have one of the best defenses in the NFL, if they win that division it'd be a huge disappointment especially with all of their weapons on offense. WK1: @ NE - WWK2: BAL - WWK3: @ CAR - WWK4: @ CLE - WWK5: TB - WWK6: BYEWK7: @ ATL - WWK8: MIA - WWK9: PIT - WWK10: @ IND - LWK11: BUF - WWK12: @ NYJ - LWK13: NO - LWK14: @ PIT - LWK15: CLE - WWK16: SD - LWK17: @ BAL - L lol @ ECN and the Bengals winning 5 games Not only will Cincinnati beat New England in week 1, but they will beat the Carolina Panthers, and will win more than 5 games. What a joke this thread has become And, you guys were saying? Oh, and before you say that I said the 49er's were going 12-4, I was one game off from the worst case scenario I gave to them. I'll go find the posts where I told you about the Cowboys sucking and Chris Johnson not doing nearly as well either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted January 3, 2011 Report Share Posted January 3, 2011 And, you guys were saying? Oh, and before you say that I said the 49er's were going 12-4, I was one game off from the worst case scenario I gave to them. I'll go find the posts where I told you about the Cowboys sucking and Chris Johnson not doing nearly as well either.Bengals had a bad year, good call, still more talented than their record suggests, as for Chris Johnson, bold prediction saying he would not do nearly as well as 2000 yards again, he still rushed for 1,350+ yards though, so I don't see the point in bringing up Chris Johnson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NomarFachix Posted January 3, 2011 Report Share Posted January 3, 2011 I had the Giants at 9-7, one game off. Better luck next year! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JYD Posted January 3, 2011 Report Share Posted January 3, 2011 8-8 new york giants I had the Giants at 9-7, one game off. Better luck next year! I had them at 8-8, so they were definitely better then I thought they'd be...just disappointed by the end of the year finish again... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AboveLegit Posted January 3, 2011 Report Share Posted January 3, 2011 imo we have played poor but are still only down by 6 at the half. Love to see Chase playing well. Never posted in this thread, but I had the Skins going 8-8 this year, so it wasn't a terribly wrong prediction... But I definitely didn't anticipate a year filled with drama and BS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastNiner Posted January 3, 2011 Report Share Posted January 3, 2011 Bengals had a bad year, good call, still more talented than their record suggests, as for Chris Johnson, bold prediction saying he would not do nearly as well as 2000 yards again, he still rushed for 1,350+ yards though, so I don't see the point in bringing up Chris Johnson. I'll find where I said he wouldn't finish in the top 5 for rushing and wouldn't reach 1,500 yards as well. I really don't get the hype with the Bengals, and the main reason for my prediction for the Bengals was because of Palmer, and he sure as hell delivered. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owner Real Deal Posted January 3, 2011 Owner Report Share Posted January 3, 2011 I'm thankful for Rolando McClain and Richard Seymour. Makes life a bit easier for Aso and Huff, having to keep an eye on the run every play. And, well, Russell is gone. Any QB is an upgrade, and if Campbell can stay on the field, it would be nice. Oakland will go 7-9, two wins more than last season. If I list the games and which ones we'll win, I'll get caught up in Raiderland and say 9-7. Happens every season, so I'm not going to set myself up for disappointment this time.Close. I can't say I'm happy with missing the playoffs, but it's a win better than I expected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Penny Posted January 3, 2011 Report Share Posted January 3, 2011 Why would someone bump this? I was really hoping no one would.Because I got the 12-4 correct so I felt the need to bump it :glasses: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.