Jump to content

MLB Offseason Thread 2010-11


Phightins
 Share

Recommended Posts

I feel like Crawford's awesome range goes to waste playing in LF at Fenway.

 

I bet he plays CF. Ellsbury will play LF and they'll put Cameron in RF.

 

I bet they trade JD Drew for someone...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like Crawford's awesome range goes to waste playing in LF at Fenway.

Yeah

I was thinking the same thing but they do play 81 games on the road, and even in LF he can just play shallow or huge the line and take away doubles and bloops

 

btw ESPN exec's after hearing news of the signing

 

http://askmissa.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/office-party1.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet he plays CF. Ellsbury will play LF and they'll put Cameron in RF.

 

I bet they trade JD Drew for someone...

 

And then Ellsbury's great range goes to waste, lol. Crawford hasn't played center in 5 years, I really doubt they move him there now, especially when they have Ellsbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then Ellsbury's great range goes to waste, lol. Crawford hasn't played center in 5 years, I really doubt they move him there now, especially when they have Ellsbury.

 

Ellsbury was their LF last year....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to the Mike Cameron signing...

 

Check it out<<<

 

Out of Ellsbury's 168 starts in the past 2 seasons, 163 have been in center (13 of 18 last year). He is a natural centerfielder. A natural centerfielder can easily play all 3 outfield positions. A natural corner outfielder can not play center so easily. Ellsbury is a natural centerfielder. Crawford is a natural corner outfielder. The decision seems simple enough to me.

Edited by Phightins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of Ellsbury's 168 starts in the past 2 seasons, 163 have been in center (13 of 18 last year). He is a natural centerfielder. A natural centerfielder can easily play all 3 outfield positions. A natural corner outfielder can not play center so easily. Ellsbury is a natural centerfielder. Crawford is a natural corner outfielder. Seems simple enough to me.

 

I thought Crawford played LF the past years in TB because they had Rocco and BJ though...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has always been a leftfielder. He is certainly athletic enough to pull off CF if they really needed him to, but with an experienced CFer in Ellsbury on the roster, I don't see why they'd want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Crawford played LF the past years in TB because they had Rocco and BJ though...?

The only time Crawford has ever played CF we because of lack of defense of the other outfielders (having someone worse fielding than him in LF)

 

1,165 games in LF

54 in CF

 

/debate to his true position...

Edited by STATCity
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has always been a leftfielder. He is certainly athletic enough to pull off CF if they really needed him to, but with an experienced CFer in Ellsbury on the roster, I don't see why they'd want to.

 

Idk, I remember reading a while back that Crawford wanted to be a CF when he left Tampa.

 

I'm not sure where the article is though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the deals Werth making 19 mil when hes 39 Crawford making 20 mil when hes 37 if Lee goes to the Yankees 25 mil when he's 38, teams are really potentially crippling themselves for the future, I kinda like it as a Mets fan that we are laying low, don't get me I'd love to get one of the big names but at least we will have a lot of money in the new few years. BTW just realized today Phils 149 mil with 17 or was it 19 players under contract, pretty crazy how insanely high their payroll has risen, I know they have quite a few contracts coming off next year but it's shocking that they got that high that quick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW just realized today Phils 149 mil with 17 or was it 19 players under contract, pretty crazy how insanely high their payroll has risen, I know they have quite a few contracts coming off next year but it's shocking that they got that high that quick.

 

That's what a new stadium and winning will do. Sellouts every night. Everything came together with perfect timing. But they are basically at their ceiling right now, which is why they are not competing for any big names now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, congrats to the Red Sox fans who are now fully embracing what they have supposedly "hated" for the past 50 years. The difference is, I don't remember the Yankees ever giving out a contract as bad as this Crawford deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, congrats to the Red Sox fans who are now fully embracing what they have supposedly "hated" for the past 50 years. The difference is, I don't remember the Yankees ever giving out a contract as bad as this Crawford deal.

Poor small market Red Sox can't keep up with, oh wait, lol this is why I hate this team more than any team in baseball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turns out mystery team #3 isn't the Angels.

 

@Ken_Rosenthal

 

 

Reportedly, they are not willing to offer more than four or five years.

Look how many years they gave Roy, not surprising, they don't like to give out long term deals to pitchers.

Edited by STATCity
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...