Jump to content

Could they win if..


*Swish*
 Share

Recommended Posts

Depends. If he only scores 20 because he shot 6-25 from the field, they likely can't win. But if he's in foul trouble all game and the shots are going elsewhere, I have some confidence in this club to pick up the slack... They live and die with the 3 ball outside of Amar'e though, so they'd have to be hot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on who they are playing, too, of course. If they are playing the Nets, they'll still win ;)

 

But no really I think they can. Wilson Chandler can fill it up, as well as Gallinari can sometimes get hot. Raymond is an underrated scorer too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on who they are playing, too, of course. If they are playing the Nets, they'll still win ;)

 

But no really I think they can. Wilson Chandler can fill it up, as well as Gallinari can sometimes get hot. Raymond is an underrated scorer too.

lmfao. Where is all of this Nets hatred coming from? I have little to no hate towards the Knicks. The only explanation I can think is that the Knicks fans are salty that they haven't made the playoffs since like 2001.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lmfao. Where is all of this Nets hatred coming from? I have little to no hate towards the Knicks. The only explanation I can think is that the Knicks fans are salty that they haven't made the playoffs since like 2001.

I was joking around, hence the ;). lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say no.

 

Scoring 30 pts is not just "scoring 10 more points than 20 pts"... if you have a player on a team dropping 30 pts every night, it's a presence, it's a force that is different than dealing with a 20 ppg player.

 

Psychology accounts for a large percentage of success in any field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to say that the New York Knicks were able to win without Amare's 30 points because so many players could pick up the slack but by analizing the game and watching the Knicks play since they're really exciting to watch, the Knicks didn't win since Amare's last 30 point game.. the Cavs game is NOT an excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to say that the New York Knicks were able to win without Amare's 30 points because so many players could pick up the slack but by analizing the game and watching the Knicks play since they're really exciting to watch, the Knicks didn't win since Amare's last 30 point game.. the Cavs game is NOT an excuse.

Well...3 games in 4 days. Coming off emotional highs playing the Celts/Heat in front of an electric garden crowd. CLE was much more desperate then the Knicks for a W. Not surprised they lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...