ChosenOne Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 According to the San Diego Union-Tribune, yes, but most likely only for one more year. The newspaper reported there remains almost no way the Chargers will sign Jackson to a long-term deal, but they would consider putting a franchise tag (likely worth approximately $10 million for one season) on him if such a designation remains part of the NFL's next collective bargaining agreement. The current labor deal expires March 4. The team views Jackson, who has sought as much as $50 million for five seasons, as a risk because of his arrests for DUIs and driving with a suspended license. There is the potential for a long suspension from the NFL if he gets in more trouble off the field. Jackson illustrated his value in this past Thursday night's victory over the San Francisco 49ers, catching three touchdown passes. Jackson signed his contract tender for this season on Oct. 29 after Week 7. He missed the next three games because of a team-imposed suspension and being placed on the roster exempt list. By being eligible to play for the final six games (he missed one due to injury), he will accrue his sixth season toward free agency. Jackson and his agent said at one point that the receiver wouldn't play at all this season because of his unhappiness at not getting a long-term deal. Counting the six games and the Chargers' Week 10 bye, Jackson will earn $240,058 rather than the $3,268,000 he would have made had he signed his tender as a restricted free agent before the season. NFL.com I would not mind keeping him at all, even if it is for 1 year for 10 million. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JYD Posted December 21, 2010 Report Share Posted December 21, 2010 they should...he's a hell of a player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.