Jenneral Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 No, I understand your point, and Gronkowski is having back to back dominant seasons, proving his consistency. I don't think he would need to be consistent to be considered a premier TE anyways because of his obvious skill level.Rodgers is having back to back dominant seasons too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastNiner Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 (edited) And Aaron Rodgers is not. Neither is Finley. Nor does Gronkowski have the best QB in the league throwing him the ball. Rodgers is having back to back dominant seasons too? What is your point? That had nothing to do with what I said. I have no clue what Universe is trying to say, not a clue. If you're trying to say Rodgers is having back to back dominant seasons, and may be the best QB in the NFL, I guess I can follow you, but what you quoted made and then responded with makes no sense. Edited October 11, 2011 by EastCoastNiner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Universe Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 What is your point? That had nothing to do with what I said. I have no clue what Universe is trying to say, not a clue. If you're trying to say Rodgers is having back to back dominant seasons, and may be the best QB in the NFL, I guess I can follow you, but what you quoted made and then responded with makes no sense.Of course you don't because understanding it would ruin your point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NomarFachix Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 What is your point? That had nothing to do with what I said. I have no clue what Universe is trying to say, not a clue. If you're trying to say Rodgers is having back to back dominant seasons, and may be the best QB in the NFL, I guess I can follow you, but what you quoted made and then responded with makes no sense.He's saying that you're using a double standard. You are blowing Gronkowski after a year and a half of success, but are saying that people can't blow Rodgers because his success has been short lived. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastNiner Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 Of course you don't because understanding it would ruin your point. Every quote you have responded to, you've barely made any sense. So, again, what is your point, or what are you asking? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Universe Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 He's saying that you're using a double standard. You are blowing Gronkowski after a year and a half of success, but are saying that people can't blow Rodgers because his success has been short lived. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastNiner Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 (edited) He's saying that you're using a double standard. You are blowing Gronkowski after a year and a half of success, but are saying that people can't blow Rodgers because his success has been short lived. That's what I figured, but they're completely different situations. 1. I have said multiple times that Rodgers is a great QB. 2. I don't think I said Gronkowski was THE best TE in the NFL in this thread. I'm pretty sure I ranked five TE's in no particular order. I'm not saying you have claimed I said either of those, but I'm just addressing the point. Now, for the point he is supposedly trying to make, the situations are not comparable. Aaron Rodgers being crowned as the #1 QB in the NFL (I see the argument) who is coming off a great season is much different than comparing a TE coming off a great rookie season and continuing his success in his second season. Crowning Rodgers the #1 QB in the NFL after having a great season last year and having a great one this year is different because his top competition for that crown is a player that just won the NFL MVP last season, is leading the league in yards this season, and is tied for passing TD's this season. For a TE, or many other positional players, I think it's much easier to rank them, and say they are for "real" after such a short period of time. With him addressing Gronkowski (I didn't really bring him up first besides the list), there aren't many TE's that were the clear class of the league last year, or are clearly at the top of the NFL this year. Not many had dominant seasons like him last year, and are continuing them this year. The situations between where Rodgers is being ranked after a short period of time (albeit longer than Gronkowski) is not the same as Gronkowski as Rodgers has supposedly dethroned the reigning NFL MVP, who is one of the all-time great QB's, who is having just as good of a season as Rodgers, and leading him in multiple important categories, and is close in others. Edited October 11, 2011 by EastCoastNiner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Universe Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 That makes zero sense. Kinda sounds like a bunch of shit into paragraphs to get your side of the point but I guess we will have to agree to disagree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Make It Naaaashty Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 Can't help but lol when ECN gets pwned. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenneral Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 Can't help but lol when ECN gets pwned.Happens all too often. Can't wait for the day when he owes me $150 and never pays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastNiner Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 Too bad it made complete sense, and you haven't tried to refute anything. You might as well post a legitimate response and explain your thoughts. Also, Prodigy, you have no room to talk about pretty much anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentch Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 I think it's funny how Finley is somehow considered by everyone to be a top 5 TE, even though the guy hasn't even played 16 games in his career 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 I think it's funny how Finley is somehow considered by everyone to be a top 5 TE, even though the guy hasn't even played 16 games in his careerSame here, I respect the guy but people have him ranked as best TE in the league, it's laughable truly. Gotta see if the guy can at least play a full season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Universe Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 Too bad it made complete sense, and you haven't tried to refute anything. You might as well post a legitimate response and explain your thoughts. Also, Prodigy, you have no room to talk about pretty much anything.It didn't though? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Make It Naaaashty Posted October 11, 2011 Report Share Posted October 11, 2011 Also, Prodigy, you have no room to talk about pretty much anything. And you do? Just get on the Hanson bandwagon and stop talking your bullshit that makes no sense. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.