Guest Nissan Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 He was sued for uploading, sharing, and downloading music. The companies gave him plenty of chances to stop sharing and downloading music, but he didn't listen. A label likes to target people who use p2p programs, share/upload music, and repeat offenders who don't stop sharing music. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheriff Shaq Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 received a warning letter from the law firm of the plaintiffs in this case in 2005, was sued in 2007, and only stopped part the way through 2008. Sucks, but his own fault. He had it coming at that point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly3rs18 Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Sucks, but his own fault. He had it coming at that point. yup. if there was no warning and he was fined that much money then i would feel bad, but i dont feel bad for him at all because he deserved what he got Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lkr Posted August 7, 2009 Report Share Posted August 7, 2009 he also deserves it for using kazaa and napster. just noticed that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobb Posted August 7, 2009 Report Share Posted August 7, 2009 Wow, if the caught everyone just imagine how the economy would look. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly3rs18 Posted August 7, 2009 Report Share Posted August 7, 2009 the government would be out of debt. i cant even imagine how much money they would make Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.