Jump to content

Linsanity is Officially Over for NYK


Recommended Posts

Melo Nugs were iso and the Woody Hawks were good.

Melo on the Nuggets wasn't a predominantly iso heavy offense. Naturally when you have a scorer like Melo, there are bound to be a handful of plays where he's going 1 on 1, but George Karl is known to run a free flowing offense that features a lot of ball movement and player movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Melo got majority of the touches and is an iso player. Maybe Karl didn't preach iso, but the offense was iso heavy (and that's probably why Karl was happy to get rid of him).

 

Would you consider the Knicks before Melo, when they won 10 straight games or whatever, to be an iso offense? Because that's exactly what Melo's Nuggets were. Melo got his touches and iso opportunities, but the overall offense was based around ball-movement.

 

The sky is blue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you consider the Knicks before Melo, when they won 10 straight games or whatever, to be an iso offense? Because that's exactly what Melo's Nuggets were. Melo got his touches and iso opportunities, but the overall offense was based around ball-movement.

 

The sky is blue.

No, I'd consider the Knicks before Melo to be a spread, high pick and roll offense. But offenses evolve around the players playing in them, right?

 

lol sky is blue.. umad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I'd consider the Knicks before Melo to be a spread, high pick and roll offense. But offenses evolve around the players playing in them, right?

 

Before Melo, the Knicks played very similarly to the Melo Nuggets...Amare was getting a ton of iso possessions (averaged like 25PPG due to it), but the Knicks were a free-flowing offense predicated on ball-movement that primarily led to 3-pointers. That is exactly what the Melo Nuggets were, except Melo caught the ball in different spots, and did a little less than Amare as far as off-ball movement is concerned.

 

Either way, neither of those 2 teams were iso offenses, despite the star player getting a ton of iso touches.

 

lol sky is blue.. umad

 

Nope, just willing to see how far you'd go to press your opinion despite the facts and over-whelming majority disproving it.

 

:glasses:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before Melo, the Knicks played very similarly to the Melo Nuggets...Amare was getting a ton of iso possessions (averaged like 25PPG due to it), but the Knicks were a free-flowing offense predicated on ball-movement that primarily led to 3-pointers. That is exactly what the Melo Nuggets were, except Melo caught the ball in different spots, and did a little less than Amare as far as off-ball movement is concerned.

 

Either way, neither of those 2 teams were iso offenses, despite the star player getting a ton of iso touches.

 

This is from the 2010 season:

 

Synergy system has its flaws. But here is the % of ISO in the offense this season:

 

Denver Nuggets* 19.5

Golden State Warriors 18.1

Atlanta Hawks* 17

Oklahoma City Thunder* 15.3

Memphis Grizzlies 15.1

Washington Wizards 14.6

Los Angeles Lakers* 14.4

Cleveland Cavaliers* 14.3

Philadelphia 76ers 14.3

Portland Trail Blazers* 13.7

 

….

 

Utah Jazz* 9

Orlando Magic* 8.1

Boston Celtics* 7.7

 

That's awfully high ISO rate for a team that didn't have a primarily ISO offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is from the 2010 season:

 

 

 

That's awfully high ISO rate for a team that didn't have a primarily ISO offense.

 

3 of his 4 last full seasons the Nuggets were top 5 in the league in assists, too. When Billups came aboard and Miller dipped, they became more iso-oriented and the assists went from top 5 to 18th in his last full season (the season you mentioned), but Melo had his career high average (28.9PPG) on a team that was 3rd in the league in assists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

All 25 Players The Knicks Have Financially Valued More Than Jeremy Lin

 

http://stk.dimemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Allan-Houston-236x360.jpg

 

Here’s the list, $8 million per year or more, in ascending chronological order:

 

1995-1996

Patrick Ewing: $18,724,000

 

1997-1998

Patrick Ewing: $20,500,000

Larry Johnson: 8,460,714

 

1998-1999

Patrick Ewing: $18,500,000, prorated salary for 50 games: $11,280,000

Larry Johnson: 10,186,000, prorated salary for 50 games: $6,211,000

Latrell Sprewell: 8,300,000, prorated salary for 50 games: $5,060,500

 

1999-2000

Patrick Ewing: $15,000,000

Larry Johnson: $11,910,714

Latrell Sprewell: $9,000,000

Allan Houston: $8,000,000

 

2000-2001

Larry Johnson: $11,000,000

Latrell Sprewell: $10,125,000

Allan Houston: $9,000,000

 

2001-2002

Allan Houston: $12,750,000

Larry Johnson: $11,335,714 (retired 10/2001)

Latrell Sprewell: $11,250,000

 

2002-2003

Allan Houston: $14,343,750

Antonio McDyess: $12,600,000

Latrell Sprewell: $12,375,000

Larry Johnson: $9,610,714

 

2003-2004

Allan Houston: $15,937,500

Antonio McDyess: $13,500,000

Keith Van Horn: $13,279,750

 

Full Story

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...