Universe Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 Yeah, if our line would've been halfway decent Rodgers would have been able to take some shots deep down field. However, that's not an option when you have the pocket collapsing right after the ball is in your hands.Add that with Ryan Grant's play and you have a loss to the Bengals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenneral Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 Add that with Ryan Grant's play and you have a loss to the Bengals.Exactlyyyyy. I don't know why most fans are so high on Grant. He was a one year wonder. It's time to move on and find someone else to carry the load. We need a RB who can make things happen even with a [expletive]ty line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reno Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 The packers are what I thought they were, a [expletive]ty team : Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
His Greatness Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 The packers are what I thought they were, a [expletive]ty team : You guys lost to them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reno Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 You guys lost to them. /shrug, must of missed my last weeks post on the packers. Bears lost to the packers last week by playing [expletive]ty, and packers believed they were a sb team. Deep down inside, I knew the packers were a [expletive]ty team, when you force 4 turnovers and still almost lost the game, your a bad team, and this week proved my point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lkr Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 You guys lost to them. And I think Grant could be a decent back if our line didn't suck so much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lkr Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 /shrug, must of missed my last weeks post on the packers. Bears lost to the packers last week by playing [expletive]ty, and packers believed they were a sb team. Deep down inside, I knew the packers were a [expletive]ty team, when you force 4 turnovers and still almost lost the game, your a bad team, and this week proved my point.so the bears are allowed to have a bad game, but the Packers aren't? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenneral Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 The packers are what I thought they were, a [expletive]ty team : I love how you waited to talk [expletive] until your team barely squeaked out the win. You guys lost to us, we suck, therefore you suck worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reno Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 I love how you waited to talk [expletive] until your team barely squeaked out the win. You guys lost to us, we suck, therefore you suck worse. Trust me, I would of done it sooner if i was by a computer. :glasses: And how many times must I explain it, bears played bad last week against the packers. Its not like the packers defense made the wide receivers run the wrong routes or call a direct snap on 4th and long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lkr Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 Trust me, I would of done it sooner if i was by a computer. :glasses: And how many times must I explain it, bears played bad last week against the packers. Its not like the packers defense made the wide receivers run the wrong routes or call a direct snap on 4th and long.I love how the Packers can't have a bad game though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
His Greatness Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 /shrug, must of missed my last weeks post on the packers. Bears lost to the packers last week by playing [expletive]ty, and packers believed they were a sb team. Deep down inside, I knew the packers were a [expletive]ty team, when you force 4 turnovers and still almost lost the game, your a bad team, and this week proved my point.... Your logic is so warped that I really have no idea how to respond. Was this post serious? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reno Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 ... Your logic is so warped that I really have no idea how to respond. Was this post serious? Yes, packers are bad, and a great veteran offense exposed them this week. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
His Greatness Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 (edited) Yes, packers are bad, and a great veteran offense exposed them this week.You guys lost to that bad team, and would've lost again this week if Jeff Reed—who's normally very reliable—didn't shank two easy field goals. Seriously, stop getting overconfident. Your team hasn't proved anything. Edited September 21, 2009 by His Greatness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reno Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 You guys lost to that bad team, and would've lost again this week if Jeff Reed—who's normally very reliable—didn't shank two easy field goals. Seriously, stop getting overconfident. Your team hasn't proved anything.First off, neither of those field goals were "easy" in that type of field condition, including goulds. And if we would have played tighter coverage and stopped the steelers on 4th n goal, we wouldn't have been in that situation. C WAT I DID DER, [expletive] like this happens all the time in the nfl. And until the vikings play a real team, they haven't proved anything yet either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenneral Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 The Packers played like [expletive] today, yes. Our O-Line sucked and didn't give Rodgers the time he needed. No excuses though, a loss is a loss and a win is a win. But shut the [expletive] up about the Bears being top [expletive] here. The Bears will finish last in the division, yes... behind the [expletive]ing Lions too. Embrace this win while you can. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Regime Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 The Packers need to do something about that LT, he's been burned in both games now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenneral Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 The Packers need to do something about that LT, he's been burned in both games now.Actually, it was our RT last game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Regime Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 Actually my bad, it was your RT both games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenneral Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 Actually my bad, it was your RT both games.No. It was our LT this game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
His Greatness Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 First off, neither of those field goals were "easy" in that type of field condition, including goulds. And if we would have played tighter coverage and stopped the steelers on 4th n goal, we wouldn't have been in that situation. C WAT I DID DER, [expletive] like this happens all the time in the nfl. There's a difference: Pittsburgh outplayed you on 4th and goal, whereas your defense had absolutely no effect on either field goals — you didn't block them, you didn't force Reed to shank them, and you certainly weren't manipulating the weather. Yes this type of [expletive] always happens, but based on what we've seen, Chicago hasn't proved anything. Either way, the logic here contradicts your ridiculous justification of the loss against Green Bay. And until the vikings play a real team, they haven't proved anything yet either.Irrelevant, but we're more proven than you are. Remember who won the division last season? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reno Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 There's a difference: Pittsburgh outplayed you on 4th and goal, whereas your defense had absolutely no effect on either field goals — you didn't block them, you didn't force Reed to shank them, and you certainly weren't manipulating the weather. Yes this type of [expletive] always happens, but based on what we've seen, Chicago hasn't proved anything. Either way, the logic here contradicts your ridiculous justification of the loss against Green Bay. Irrelevant, but we're more proven than you are. Remember who won the division last season? Ok ,lets go ahead and give the steelers those 2 fieldgoals, which would give them a 6 point lead. Cutler, on his final drive, was looking unstoppable, the wide receivers were finding themselves wide open. I guarantee you he would of scored a touchdown that drive, instead of having Robbie kick a fieldgoal, and we would of won regardless 21-20 instead of 17-14. But now we are playing hypothetical situations, which is rather pointless. We got 14 games left this season, and I expect us to improve in each one of them. To bad I have to wait till week 12 to watch the bears play the viqueens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 /shrug, must of missed my last weeks post on the packers. Bears lost to the packers last week by playing [expletive]ty, and packers believed they were a sb team. Deep down inside, I knew the packers were a [expletive]ty team, when you force 4 turnovers and still almost lost the game, your a bad team, and this week proved my point.So in your logic that Giants are a bad team too right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Universe Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 Only thing you can do is laugh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reno Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 So in your logic that Giants are a bad team too right? Not entirely, the nyg did not finish 6-10 last season. However, I do question on whether the nyg is a top team in the nfl this year, but will see as the season goes on. They had 2 hard fought wins, and last night could have went either way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Universe Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 I don't get who said the Packers were a top team? You talk more about the Packers than any other team. Did Favre or someone not shake your hand or email you back? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.