Green Bay @ Minnesota

[reno]

Favre is old and can't lead the Vikings to the Super Bowl.

 

I agree, favre will have a late season breakdown, probably around week 12.

[Warren2ThaG]

Vikings right up there with Saints/Giants.

[Diesel]

Vikings right up there with Saints/Giants.

 

Not at all, they got outplayed by the crappy 49ers.

 

A team whose best offensive weapons consist of Shaun Hill, Glen Coffee, Joe Morgan outplayed them. The Vikings won the game because of a lucky play, but they were outplayed and I can't wait to see them get owned when they play a respectable team.

[His Greatness]

Who did you guys beat?

 

A Packers team with a [expletive] offensive line? My grandma would've got a sack on those guys.

 

Enjoy the crappy teams

San Francisco is legit, and Green Bay has an explosive offense. Dominating their line is part of the game.

[Warren2ThaG]

Not at all, they got outplayed by the crappy 49ers.

 

A team whose best offensive weapons consist of Shaun Hill, Glen Coffee, Joe Morgan outplayed them. The Vikings won the game because of a lucky play, but they were outplayed and I can't wait to see them get owned when they play a respectable team.

 

49ers have one of the best defensives and are underrated. Do you expect Minny to win every game 30-10? It's the NFL man.

[reno]

San Francisco is legit, and Green Bay has an explosive offense. Dominating their line is part of the game.

 

San Fransisco is legit, but you guys should of lost that game. And EVERY team green bay has been against, their oline got dominated. Will see how the vikings play against the ravens, after they face dem rams next week. What a joke.

[Diesel]

San Francisco is legit, and Green Bay has an explosive offense. Dominating their line is part of the game.

 

An explosive offense? They have a good QB and recievers, but what else? If you can't protect that QB it doesn't matter. Their offensive line is pathetic and has let up the most sacks in the league. Their Running game is incredibly inconsistant. With Clifton out it was even worse and I didn't even need to watch this game to be able to tell who would win.

 

And San Francisco sucks. Their D is solid, but definetly not elite. Without Frank Gore they have nothing on offense. Wanna bet they don't win a playoff game?

[s.t.a.t.]

San Francisco is legit, and Green Bay has an explosive offense. Dominating their line is part of the game.

 

They had a guard playing as a tackle because Clifton was out. Then when colledge went down, idk who even came in for him. He was basically playing against a nobody. Reguardless he is very good but I mean come on, this has to be the worst Offensive line of all time. Good game for both teams. It seems wierd seeing Favre in the purple as it always will for me. The pack just have to finish when they have the chances and thats what they didnt do tonight.

[His Greatness]

Not at all, they got outplayed by the crappy 49ers.

 

A team whose best offensive weapons consist of Shaun Hill, Glen Coffee, Joe Morgan outplayed them. The Vikings won the game because of a lucky play, but they were outplayed and I can't wait to see them get owned when they play a respectable team.

San Francisco didn't convert a third down, we outgained them on offense and owned the time of possession. If that's luck, then you can chalk up every score to luck. It was a better team making a better play when it mattered most.

[Diesel]

San Francisco didn't convert a third down

 

Like I said, because they suck.

 

Pretty hard to get some conversions with Shaun Hill and Glen Coffee as your main weapons.

[EastCoastNiner]

Like I said, because they suck.

 

Pretty hard to get some conversions with Shaun Hill and Glen Coffee as your main weapons.

 

They only have one of the best defenses in the NFL, and certainly better than the Philadelphia Eagles, that is for sure.

[His Greatness]

An explosive offense? They have a good QB and recievers, but what else? If you can't protect that QB it doesn't matter. Their offensive line is pathetic and has let up the most sacks in the league. Their Running game is incredibly inconsistant. With Clifton out it was even worse and I didn't even need to watch this game to be able to tell who would win.

That is an explosive offense. You saw what they did in 1:19 late in the 4th... you can't sleep on them. The line blows, but again, thoroughly dominating that unit is still a function of the game and a testament to Minnesota's defensive.

 

And San Francisco sucks. Their D is solid, but definetly not elite. Without Frank Gore they have nothing on offense. Wanna bet they don't win a playoff game?

Yeah, that's not sucking. "Sucking" is not the only alternative to not being elite. 49ers aren't either; they're a good team. I don't get what you're trying to disprove.

 

In fact, what are any of you trying to disprove? The Vikings are 4-0. I never said they were the best team in the league, because they're not, but is it implausible to say they're up there?

 

San Fransisco is legit, but you guys should of lost that game. And EVERY team green bay has been against, their oline got dominated. Will see how the vikings play against the ravens, after they face dem rams next week. What a joke.

If we should've lost then we would've. See the above post.

[Jenneral]

dabearfan - please stop posting in these threads as you're obviously the most biased piece of [expletive] I've ever had to deal with.

 

You're right, everyone except "Da Bears" either sucks or is overachieving.

[Universe]

You can tell Rodgers just isn't getting comfortable in the pocket. I hope we can trade for a linemen to atleast show we want to improve in that aspect.

 

Sweet catch by Jennings to off the knees.

[Diesel]

They only have one of the best defenses in the NFL, and certainly better than the Philadelphia Eagles, that is for sure.

 

LOOOOOOOOOOOL

That is a good one. 49ers > Eagles now. If your going to bring my team into the topic at least don't post crap like this. That is embarassing for the Eagles to be compared to that crappy team.

 

That is an explosive offense. You saw what they did in 1:19 late in the 4th... you can't sleep on them. The line blows, but again, thoroughly dominating that unit is still a function of the game and a testament to Minnesota's defensive.

 

An explosive offense gives the QB time to make a throw. Pretty hard to do when you got Jared Allen already coming straight at you once you catch the ball. A traffic cone could've done a better job blocking.

 

 

Yeah, that's not sucking. "Sucking" is not the only alternative to not being elite. 49ers aren't either; they're a good team. I don't get what you're trying to disprove.

 

In fact, what are any of you trying to disprove? The Vikings are 4-0. I never said they were the best team in the league, because they're not, but is it implausible to say they're up there?

 

That the Vikings wins have been against teams that finished below .500 last season and none of their wins have been impressive. Got lucky against a bad 49ers team and are overrated. And no the 49ers arn't good without Frank Gore. Letting that offense score on you is a slap in the face in itself.

[SRT Spidey]

wow..tlk about haters..vikes are easily one of the top nfc teams with favre at qb. u guys will be eatin the [expletive]talk wenthey prove that

[Smitty]

They only have one of the best defenses in the NFL, and certainly better than the Philadelphia Eagles, that is for sure.

 

 

I try to be as unbiased as I can nowadays, but my reaction to this is simply.....

 

http://i34.tinypic.com/vxyzw2.jpg

 

I mean..we are talking about the same Eagles that crushed the 49ers last year, right?

[Lkr]

It's not even just their o-line it's over rated Aaron Rodgers holding the ball too long.

 

Rodgers has also been doing a horrible job with the hard count. Allen has been like past the line of scrimmage before Rodgers catches the ball in the shot gun.

LMAO

 

You want him to throw it in 2 seconds? At least he doesn't throw it to Champ Bailey 50 times

[EastCoastNiner]

I try to be as unbiased as I can nowadays, but my reaction to this is simply.....

 

http://i34.tinypic.com/vxyzw2.jpg

 

I mean..we are talking about the same Eagles that crushed the 49ers last year, right?

 

I won't talk about that game last year because it should have been much closer without some of the bull-[expletive] that went against the San Fransisco 49er's.

 

 

It's a much better defense, the defense that shut down the Arizona Cardinals, which is the same team that made the Philadelphia Eagles their [expletive] in the playoffs last year, and better than the defense that got smacked around by the New Orleans Saints.

 

It's the same defense that shut-down Adrian Peterson and played very well on defense except for a kick-return and a "Hail Mary".

[His Greatness]

An explosive offense gives the QB time to make a throw. Pretty hard to do when you got Jared Allen already coming straight at you once you catch the ball. A traffic cone could've done a better job blocking.

An explosive offense has the weapons to score at any given time. Give Rodgers a few seconds and he's going to eat your secondary. Man was suffocated last night and still managed 384 yards. That's why it's called explosive.

 

That the Vikings wins have been against teams that finished below .500 last season and none of their wins have been impressive. Got lucky against a bad 49ers team and are overrated. And no the 49ers arn't good without Frank Gore. Letting that offense score on you is a slap in the face in itself.

Tennessee had the best record in the league last season. Carolina tied for best in the NFC. New Orleans and Denver finished at exactly .500. The Bengals were one of the worst teams, and now they're in front of the champs in the division. Don't use last season as the sole indicator of a team's caliber, otherwise that begets the counter of Minnesota posting an impressive 10-6 record without a quarterback. But you're not willing to admit that they're actually good, are you?

 

Every Minnesota victory has been decisive with the exception of San Francisco, who they still beat and outplayed. A win is a win. If you're looking for a blowout, you won't ever get one from this team because Childress is too much of a [expletive].

 

And yes... the 49ers are good. Please stop nitpicking.

 

"LOL YOU GOT LUCKY AGAINST THE NINERS WE OWNED PETERSON, DAWKINS PENIS IS HUGE ABOUT EIGHT INCHES I THINK"

Edited October 7, 2009 by His Greatness

[ChosenOne]

I am going to put it simple Allen adn that d line for Minnesota really came to play. Yes you can say Green bay has not o line but still it was real ugly, hb ans te really did not even help. Rodgers took so many hits in the first half that he really was kind of jumpy for the rest of the game. Also when his line did give him time he held it for to long. Coaching is also to blame I dont put this all on the players, they had not asnwer for the perssure put on by the Vikings.

[Diesel]

An explosive offense has the weapons to score at any given time. Give Rodgers a few seconds and he's going to eat your secondary. Man was suffocated last night and still managed 384 yards. That's why it's called explosive.

 

 

Tennessee had the best record in the league last season. Carolina tied for best in the NFC. New Orleans and Denver finished at exactly .500. The Bengals were one of the worst teams, and now they're in front of the champs in the division. Don't use last season as the sole indicator of a team's caliber, otherwise that begets the counter of Minnesota posting an impressive 10-6 record without a quarterback. But you're not willing to admit that they're actually good, are you?

 

Every Minnesota victory has been decisive with the exception of San Francisco, who they still beat and outplayed. A win is a win. If you're looking for a blowout, you won't ever get one from this team because Childress is too much of a [expletive].

 

And yes... the 49ers are good. Please stop nitpicking.

 

"LOL YOU GOT LUCKY AGAINST THE NINERS WE OWNED PETERSON, DAWKINS PENIS IS HUGE ABOUT EIGHT INCHES I THINK"

 

Rodgers got all those yards because the Packers were forced to throw on every play since they wre playing from behind. Just look at their run/pass ratio.

 

And it isn't the sole indicator, but a team that goes 2-14 the year before is bound to be worse than a team that went 12-4. It can give you an idea. Minnesota is a good team, but when you post things like "WHO SAYS BRETT FAVRE CANT WIN A SUPERBOWL" you are asking for it and I would bet you Minnesota doesn't win the superbowl. Not when it takes pure luck to beat crappy teams like the 49ers. Noone is scared of them. Their offense is attrocious without Frank Gore. Their best weapon is probably Vernon Davis LOL.

 

And it's actually 8.3 inches.

 

I won't talk about that game last year because it should have been much closer without some of the bull-[expletive] that went against the San Fransisco 49er's.

 

It's a much better defense, the defense that shut down the Arizona Cardinals, which is the same team that made the Philadelphia Eagles their [expletive] in the playoffs last year, and better than the defense that got smacked around by the New Orleans Saints.

 

It's the same defense that shut-down Adrian Peterson and played very well on defense except for a kick-return and a "Hail Mary".

 

The Arizona Cardinals of 2009 thus far are far different than the team that got hot in the playoffs last year and was a Santonio Holmes pass short of winning a superbowl. Horrible example.

 

And the Eagles > the Vikings without the injuries so I don't know whhy your using that to support your argument. You are lucky San Francisco isn't on the Eagles schedule this year. I will miss that automatic win.

Edited October 7, 2009 by Diesel

[His Greatness]

Rodgers got all those yards because the Packers were forced to throw on every play since they wre playing from behind. Just look at their run/pass ratio.

Green Bay had no business even being in that game at the end. It was their offense that kept them in it.

 

And if you don't buy it from the Vikings game, then watch any other game. That offense is top-notch.

 

And it isn't the sole indicator, but a team that goes 2-14 the year before is bound to be worse than a team that went 12-4. It can give you an idea.

I'd be much more proud of beating the 49ers than beating the Panthers or Titans this year.

 

Minnesota is a good team, but when you post things like "WHO SAYS BRETT FAVRE CANT WIN A SUPERBOWL" you are asking for it and I would bet you Minnesota doesn't win the superbowl. Not when it takes pure luck to beat crappy teams like the 49ers. Noone is scared of them. Their offense is attrocious without Frank Gore. Their best weapon is probably Vernon Davis LOL.

1) Again, it wasn't pure luck; we outplayed them. Blindly rehashing a point when it's already been disproved doesn't make it any more true than it was the first time.

2) lol, blame it on the schedule makers for not plotting the Vikings against an elite team earlier in the season. Not their fault. That's a pretty sh-tty way to discredit a team anyways.

3) Never posted that or even slightly suggested that the Vikings would win the Super Bowl. What I said was:

Favre is old and can't lead the Vikings to the Super Bowl.

Sarcasm, if you couldn't tell. Besides, it's not like it's unrealistic for Minnesota to be in the Super Bowl.

4) The 49ers are good. Nothing more, nothing less. Their defense is solid, Hill is more than a game-manager, Davis looks like he's finally coming around, and Coffee is a serviceable stopgap that did a fine job filling in.

[s.t.a.t.]

The thing is though, the vikings could have easily lost the game though. Take away our two turnovers in the redzone and its a different game. Granted that is how the game goes. I think the only reason why the vikings won was because of the defense line. Our extreme lack of an O-Line is disgusting to me. I mean against the bengals that one guy had 5 sacks on Rodgers and then Jared Allen had a nobody guarding him letting him by every single time. The game could have gone either way and it just happens that the pack came out on the losing end this time.

[His Greatness]

The thing is though, the vikings could have easily lost the game though. Take away our two turnovers in the redzone and its a different game. Granted that is how the game goes. I think the only reason why the vikings won was because of the defense line. Our extreme lack of an O-Line is disgusting to me. I mean against the bengals that one guy had 5 sacks on Rodgers and then Jared Allen had a nobody guarding him letting him by every single time. The game could have gone either way and it just happens that the pack came out on the losing end this time.

Every game could go either way if you move a few things around. But that's not how it works.