Owner Real Deal Posted October 30, 2009 Owner Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 Take your picks and explain why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenneral Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 Knicks because it can't be the Bucks. Clippers because I have a gut feeling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poe Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 Bucks and Kings. They don't apparently have the weapons needed to succeed. I could be wrong, and things can change, but it looks to me like they'll at least be high lottery picks for next offseason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliCurbStomppa Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 Bobcats and Kings. Bobcats cant even play D and they are gonna miss Ekafor and the Kings only got Kevin Martin that can actually score and they could be a bad team for years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MainEv3nt Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 kings and bobcats. why is wizards on the list? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owner Real Deal Posted October 30, 2009 Author Owner Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 kings and bobcats. why is wizards on the list?Because they were on the list last year, and Gilbert has returned to the lineup before, only to make an early exit. Not saying he will again, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueDevil Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 Bucks- Injuries always seems to come up with this team, and Redd will most likely be traded later in the season. Big time rebuilding.Kings- Downright aweful, how is Sean May starting?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 I'll say the Bucks and Memphis. I think the Kinga will be decent but that's because I think Tyreke Evans is a beast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owner Real Deal Posted October 30, 2009 Author Owner Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 I also have to go with the Bucks and the Kings here. Redd is probably gone by February, and unless Jennings decides he's going to ride home with the ROY crown, I don't see the Bucks winning many games this year. Sacramento is just a mess, other than K-Mart and Evans. Thompson is a decent player, but there's no chemistry between anyone, no coach or assistant coaches that can turn them around, and there are rumors that the Kings will be moving. It's all downhill from here, it seems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smitty Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 For people that said Bobcats...I'd love to hear why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Penny Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 I also have to go with the Bucks and the Kings here. Redd is probably gone by February, and unless Jennings decides he's going to ride home with the ROY crown, I don't see the Bucks winning many games this year. Sacramento is just a mess, other than K-Mart and Evans. Thompson is a decent player, but there's no chemistry between anyone, no coach or assistant coaches that can turn them around, and there are rumors that the Kings will be moving. It's all downhill from here, it seems.agree w/ this. seriously, who voted for detroit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChosenOne Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 Kings the are just bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knickmatic Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 Kings the are just bad.??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren2ThaG Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 Can the worst NBA teams lose to the best NCAA teams? MIL n MIN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Regime Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 Kings and Bucks for pretty much the same reasons mentioned above. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Posted November 1, 2009 Report Share Posted November 1, 2009 Can the worst NBA teams lose to the best NCAA teams? MIL n MIN.Nope. No college team can beat a pro sports team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Wolf Posted November 2, 2009 Report Share Posted November 2, 2009 Can the worst NBA teams lose to the best NCAA teams? MIL n MIN.Min as the worst Western Conference team? Really? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren2ThaG Posted November 2, 2009 Report Share Posted November 2, 2009 Min as the worst Western Conference team? Really? Without Love yes, sry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Wolf Posted November 2, 2009 Report Share Posted November 2, 2009 For 6 weeks max. The Wolves defeated the Nets with a huge come back and was consistently breathing down the Cavaliers and Suns towards the end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erick Blasco Posted November 2, 2009 Report Share Posted November 2, 2009 As many others have said, the Kings are a mess and the Bucks don't have much healthy talent (Bogut and Redd are coming off of serious injuries). I saw Charlotte play against the Knicks, their defense is actually fine. Man are they going to have a touch time scoring though without Flip Murray and Raja Bell stretching the floor so Boris Diaw and Gerald Wallace can post. But they're still better than Milwaukee. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.