Jump to content

Would you rather have Artest or Ariza?


Guest N4S
 Share

Would you rather have Artest or Ariza?  

29 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Artest no doubt, this guy is offensively and defensively better than Ariza. Ariza played good because he had Kobe & Gasol as teammates that allowed him to do his thing. With the Rockets, that won't be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Artest its not close. Ariza was just good cause teams would leave him wide open to focus on Kobe/Odom/Gasol. Artest can create his own shot and make any shot, not to mention how he will be open a lot more and will be able to score a lot easier. And defensively Ariza is nowhere near as good. He could get steals and read passing lanes well, but Artest does that just as well as Trevor considering that Artest averaged about 2 steals per game as well. You put Ariza on a scorer like Pierce, Melo, and he will get lit up. Artest can shut down any perimeter player in the league. On both sides of the ball Artest is better. Kobe is not the only perimeter player that can create his own shot and post up, Artest will make Kobe's job a lot easier now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Artest. Simply stated he's better on both sides of the ball, especially post defense. Ariza was getting killed in the post all year. Now Kobe doesn't have to worry about guarding that post in the situations that Ariza couldn't. Ron Ron is salivating to play some D in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Owner

Point of concern is Kobe handles the ball a lot and he's going to pass to Artest... I doubt Artest is a better spot up shooter than Ariza. That was biggest key in spreading their offense in the Finals and Denver series.

Without looking, I'm pretty sure Artest shot better from three than Ariza did, even with probably twice as many attempts. Ariza's higher field goal percentage comes from him attacking the rim and getting wide-open shots. Artest wasn't going to see much of that in Houston, especially when Yao was struggling or out.

 

A primary option Ron Artest is a bad thing. One that can take a backseat and be the third option is excellent. Saying he won't take a backseat to a player is ridiculous (just putting this here in advance) because he did that with Kevin Martin in Sacramento, and Jermaine O'Neal in Indiana, with no problems (he just didn't like Sacramento).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Artest no question. Ariza played well because he was alongside Kobe and Pau, who each got him open looks and made him play better than he ever thought he could. I like his game, especially his defense, but he won't be nearly the player he was in L.A now that he's with Houston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A primary option Ron Artest is a bad thing. One that can take a backseat and be the third option is excellent. Saying he won't take a backseat to a player is ridiculous (just putting this here in advance) because he did that with Kevin Martin in Sacramento, and Jermaine O'Neal in Indiana, with no problems (he just didn't like Sacramento).

He also took a "backseat" to McGrady and Yao, but that didn't work out as planned.

 

As for his spot-up shooting: Artest, with his feet set, is a very accurate shooter. The thing is, he's not a spot-up shooter, and has never been utilized as one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Owner

He also took a "backseat" to McGrady and Yao, but that didn't work out as planned.

McGrady did as good as Smush Parker back in 2006. Smush probably had the better season, actually.

 

You guys are trying your best to dig up excuses as to why this signing won't work out for us. It was done with Gasol, when Pau wasn't going to be content with Kobe's shot attempts and him and Lamar/Bynum not being able to play together. People were saying that Fisher was a little too old to contribute anymore. People thought that the Ariza and Evans trade was a lateral move for us.

 

Just how things go, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McGrady did as good as Smush Parker back in 2006. Smush probably had the better season, actually.

His knee wasn't 100% to begin with, but he would have a slew of solid games, and then be disabled intermittently by the sore knee from all the exertion.

 

You guys are trying your best to dig up excuses as to why this signing won't work out for us.

Why, I never. I am a paragon of impartiality. I have always posted with a completely objective perspective. The Lakers are just another team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Artest. Simply stated he's better on both sides of the ball, especially post defense. Ariza was getting killed in the post all year. Now Kobe doesn't have to worry about guarding that post in the situations that Ariza couldn't. Ron Ron is salivating to play some D in there.

 

Agree Artest in a landslide and an example of what your stating would be in Game 1 & Game 2 against Denver when Melo would post up & just dominate Ariza. Great move by us and I'm already at Figueroa waiting for a parade

Edited by magicbalala245
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can enjoy a guy who only plays for money alright while here in LA we are winning titles.

 

lol......

 

And you can enjoy a guy who jacks up random shots and will probably be the reason you guys dont win a title.

 

You guys had a better chance with Ariza honestly

 

This signing wont be one of those,OMGZ WE GET TALENTED PLAYER MEANS WE GET BETTER signings.

 

Ariza fit better defensively and was a cherry picker who took smart shots and made it when he needed to and stepped up in the playoffs.

Artest is good defensively but his performance on offense is very weird and he shot so terribly in the playoffs. this wont help the Lakers as much as fans are boasting about and I dont even see the Lakers winning a title now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With so many good players on the Lakers and one basketball, I think Ariza fit the team more but we will see how it works out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Owner

Damn, even I was able to admit that the Spurs, who I absolutely hate, were a much better team after getting Jefferson.

 

I can't believe what I'm hearing. If you don't think Ron Artest fits into the triangle and that we'll miss Ariza's defense over Ron (which is hilarious), then I don't know what to tell you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...